标普之所以只攻击 Tether,是因为 Tether 正在用对方擅长的方式挑战并击败传统金融势力。 这些老牌企业无法接受像 Tether 和 Rumble 这样的公司正在抢占它们的市场份额——它们唯一能做的,就是在节节败退时攻击我们。 The S&P only attacks Tether, because Tether is challenging and beating the old financial guard at their own game. These old corporate entities cannot handle companies like Tether & Rumble taking their market share — their only recourse is to attack us because they’re losing.
Chris PavlovskiCEO of Rumble
观点原文
标普之所以只攻击 Tether,是因为 Tether 正在用对方擅长的方式挑战并击败传统金融势力。
这些老牌企业无法接受像 Tether 和 Rumble 这样的公司正在抢占它们的市场份额——它们唯一能做的,就是在节节败退时攻击我们。
The S&P only attacks Tether, because Tether is challenging and beating the old financial guard at their own game.
These old corporate entities cannot handle companies like Tether & Rumble taking their market share — their only recourse is to attack us because they’re losing.
Stablecoin
相关观点
- 参议院银行委员会正力争在午夜前提交其最新版本(仍为两党支持)的市场结构法案文本。在我看来,这一天可谓“相当折腾”:双方围绕稳定币收益问题出现了强烈分歧与不适情绪。随着时间逼近周四,稳定币收益已然成为当前最棘手、最难解决的核心议题。 The Senate Banking Committee is aiming to file its latest (still) bipartisan market structure text before midnight after what’s been described to me as a “doozy” of a day, full of intense heartburn from both sides over stablecoin yield, now emerging as THE thorniest issue as we head towards Thursday.Eleanor Terrett · 2026/01/13
- 鉴于参议院银行委员会将于下周就市场结构问题进行投票的消息,我们需要记住:稳定币让任何人、在世界任何地方,只需一个互联网连接,就能使用美元。我们不应通过限制消费者将资金投入使用的自由,来削弱这项足以改变世界的创新。《GENIUS 法案》在这一点上处理得非常谨慎,并未这样做。 随着这场讨论的持续,至关重要的是:消费者利益、创新能力以及美国的全球竞争力,必须始终处于核心位置;同时,也要与政策制定者展开理性、建设性的对话,例如 Mark Warner 和 Angela Alsobrooks。 Given the news that the Senate Banking committee will vote next week on market structure, let's remember that stablecoins allow anyone, anywhere to access U.S. dollars with just an internet connection. We shouldn’t undercut this world-changing innovation by restricting consumer freedom to put their money to work. The GENIUS Act was careful not to do that. As this debate continues, it’s important that consumer interests, innovation, and U.S. competitiveness remain front and center, alongside a thoughtful dialogue with policymakers like @MarkWarner and @Sen_Alsobrooks.Joseph Lubin · 2026/01/07
- 中国已经决定为其自有的稳定币支付利息,因为这有利于普通民众,而且他们将其视为一种竞争优势。 我担心,在美国,我们可能只见树木、不见森林。给稳定币提供收益,并不会在任何程度上改变借贷市场本身——但它会对美国稳定币是否具备竞争力产生重大影响。 奖励机制(甚至直接支付利息)和社区借贷一样,都会让普通人受益。我们必须允许市场同时发展这两种模式。 China has decided to pay interest on their own stablecoin, because it benefits ordinary people, and they recognize it as a competitive advantage. I worry we are missing the forest through the trees in the U.S. Rewards on stablecoins will not change lending one bit - but it does have a big impact on whether U.S. stablecoins are competitive. Rewards (or even paying interest) benefits ordinary people just like community lending does. We have to let the market do both.Brian Armstrong · 2026/01/07
- Tether 出的开源密码管理器,简单体验了下还不错,完全离线体验。先吐槽两个安全点吧: 1. 密码默认才 8 位,太短了… 2. 导出 Vault 的文件居然是明文,吓死我了… 还有,什么时候类似 1Password 那样支持钱包助记词加密保存? 期待后续版本…Cos(余弦) · 2025/12/19