2013 年的华尔街： “比特币是给罪犯和毒贩用的。” 2025 年的华尔街： 干脆自己成了罪犯和毒贩。 最讽刺、也最精彩的地方在于： 比特币把他们变成了他们当年指控它成为的样子。 事实证明，真正的庞氏骗局，是一个需要你“获得许可”的旧金融体系—— 这个体系一边把自己印成 38 万亿美元的财政赤字， 一边却把总量恒定的资产称为“投机品”。 他们花了十年说： “比特币会归零。” 接下来他们还会再花十年解释： 为什么他们的比特币 ETF 值得收 1% 的管理费。 这场革命，最终会被写进一份 S-1 招股说明书， 并由当年宣称它必然失败的那批人加以变现。 中本聪最伟大的创新之一， 就是把敌人变得足够富有，以至于他们会替他去捍卫比特币。 Wall Street in 2013: "Bitcoin is for criminals and drug dealers" Wall Street in 2025: literally becomes the criminal and drug dealer The most beautiful part? Bitcoin changed them into what they always accused it of being. Turns out the real Ponzi scheme was needing permission from a legacy financial system that printed itself into a $38 trillion deficit while calling a fixed-supply asset "speculative". They spent a decade saying "Bitcoin will go to zero". Now they'll spend a decade explaining why their ETF deserves a 1% management fee. The revolution will be captured in an S-1 filing and monetized by the same people who said it would fail. Satoshi's greatest innovation was was making his enemies rich enough that they'd defend it for him.
Adam LivingstonThe Bitcoin Wizard
观点原文
2013 年的华尔街：
“比特币是给罪犯和毒贩用的。”
2025 年的华尔街：
干脆自己成了罪犯和毒贩。
最讽刺、也最精彩的地方在于：
比特币把他们变成了他们当年指控它成为的样子。
事实证明，真正的庞氏骗局，是一个需要你“获得许可”的旧金融体系——
这个体系一边把自己印成 38 万亿美元的财政赤字，
一边却把总量恒定的资产称为“投机品”。
他们花了十年说：
“比特币会归零。”
接下来他们还会再花十年解释：
为什么他们的比特币 ETF 值得收 1% 的管理费。
这场革命，最终会被写进一份 S-1 招股说明书，
并由当年宣称它必然失败的那批人加以变现。
中本聪最伟大的创新之一，
就是把敌人变得足够富有，以至于他们会替他去捍卫比特币。
Wall Street in 2013: "Bitcoin is for criminals and drug dealers"
Wall Street in 2025: literally becomes the criminal and drug dealer
The most beautiful part? Bitcoin changed them into what they always accused it of being.
Turns out the real Ponzi scheme was needing permission from a legacy financial system that printed itself into a $38 trillion deficit while calling a fixed-supply asset "speculative".
They spent a decade saying "Bitcoin will go to zero".
Now they'll spend a decade explaining why their ETF deserves a 1% management fee.
The revolution will be captured in an S-1 filing and monetized by the same people who said it would fail.
Satoshi's greatest innovation was was making his enemies rich enough that they'd defend it for him.
Bitcoin
相关观点
- 2007 年，诺基亚占据了 50% 的手机市场。 2010 年，百视达拒绝了奈飞。 2015 年，出租车司机嘲笑 Uber。 2023 年，人们说 AI 永远不可能取代工作。 2026 年，人们又说塞勒不可能利用数字资本去重塑固定收益市场。 要么进化，要么成为案例。 In 2007, Nokia had 50% of the phone market. In 2010, Blockbuster rejected Netflix. In 2015, taxis laughed at Uber. In 2023, they said AI would never replace jobs. In 2026, they said Saylor wouldn't use digital capital to revolutionize the fixed income market. Adapt or become a case study.Adam Livingston · 2026/01/19
- Strategy 与罗斯柴尔德家族——第一个建立在比特币之上的帝国 历史不会简单重复，但货币架构会。 我在跨越 三个世纪的金融权力史 中，追踪到同一个模式： * 英格兰银行的主权债务机器 * Rothschild family 的黄金清算网络 * Strategy 的比特币金库飞轮 每一个时代，都遵循同一套底层逻辑： * 掌控最核心的抵押品 * 以低于其长期升值速度的成本进行融资 * 将规模转化为更强的资本获取能力 * 不断复利，直到竞争者在结构上被彻底挤出 18 世纪，英国通过“永久国债”这一金融武器，构建了全球帝国。 19 世纪，罗斯柴尔德家族控制了黄金结算体系，主导了整个欧洲的流动性。 今天，Strategy 正在公共资本市场中复制同样的架构——以比特币作为储备资产，以股票市场作为放大器。 🔥STRATEGY AND THE ROTHSCHILDS - THE FIRST EMPIRE BUILT ON BITCOIN🔥 History doesn’t repeat itself, but monetary architecture does! I trace a single pattern across three centuries of financial power: The Bank of England’s sovereign debt machine The Rothschild bullion network Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury flywheel Each era follows the same logic: Secure the dominant collateral. Finance it below its long-term appreciation rate. Recycle scale into greater access to capital. Compound until competitors are structurally boxed out. In the 18th century, Britain weaponized perpetual bonds and built a global empire. In the 19th century, the Rothschilds controlled gold settlement and dictated liquidity across Europe. Today, Strategy applies that same architecture inside public markets using Bitcoin as the reserve asset and equity markets as the amplifierAdam Livingston · 2026/01/11
- 2015 年告诉你比特币一文不值的那些理财顾问，如今大多在各家公司里任职于所谓的“区块链部门”，还会在 LinkedIn 上给你发关于“数字资产整合”的帖子。 这些人，正是当年一边用邮寄方式报税，一边说互联网只是昙花一现的人。 这场革命，不会被分散配置在一个 60/40 的投资组合里。 Every financial advisor who told you Bitcoin was worthless in 2015 now works at a company with a "blockchain division" and sends you LinkedIn posts about "digital asset integration." These are the same people who said the internet was a fad while filing their taxes by mail. The revolution will not be diversified across a 60/40 portfolio.Adam Livingston · 2026/01/05
- 很多普通人觉得比特币很危险。 与此同时，他们却把一生的积蓄存进一家依法可以把其中 90% 拿去放贷的银行，用来资助别人买第四套投资房；他们的信用评分由算法决定，而这些算法甚至会因为你太快还清债务而惩罚你；他们在工作中，雇主周四凌晨 2 点就能看到工资入账，却仍然让他们等到周五才能动用自己的钱，理由是“处理中”；他们每月花 840 美元买医保，却还有 7,000 美元的自付额，等于花钱只是为了继续自掏腰包付一切费用的资格；他们看着在 1987 年花 4.3 万美元买房的婴儿潮一代父母对自己说“多存点钱就好了”，而现在一套入门级住房的价格却是中位年薪的 47 倍；他们还把钱放在一个系统里，在这个系统中，12 个人坐在一个房间里就能凭空创造 4 万亿美元，并在 18 个月内抹掉你 30% 的购买力，理由是商业地产“具有系统性重要性”。 但当然啦，那个去中心化、持有即所有、拥有完美可审计轨迹、且完全无法被增发的资产，才是所谓的“投机赌博”。 而不是美元——它背靠的是一个负债 38 万亿美元的政府所承诺的“完全信用与担保”，这个政府刚刚还在巴尔的摩，在一座被船撞坏的桥上花了 1,500 亿美元。 退出这场彻底的疯狂吧。 Normies think Bitcoin is risky. Meanwhile they’re depositing their entire life savings into a bank that’s legally allowed to lend out 90% of it to fund someone’s fourth investment property, getting a credit score determined by algorithms that penalize you for PAYING OFF debt too fast, working jobs where their employer can see their direct deposit hit at 2am Thursday but still makes them wait until Friday to access their own money “for processing,” spending $840/month on health insurance that has a $7,000 deductible so they’re essentially paying for the privilege of still paying for everything, watching their boomer parents who bought a house for $43,000 in 1987 tell them to “just save more” while a starter home costs 47x the median salary, and literally keeping their money in a system where 12 guys in a room can decide to create $4 trillion out of thin air and delete 30% of your purchasing power in 18 months because the commercial real estate market is “systemically important.” But sure, the decentralized bearer asset with a perfect audit trail and absolutely zero way to inflate the supply is the speculative gamble. Not the dollar, which is backed by the “full faith and credit” of a government that’s $38 trillion in debt and just spent $150 billion on a bridge in Baltimore that a boat crashed into. Opt out of this absolute madness.Adam Livingston · 2025/12/30