我们在没有向投资人路演的情况下,已经为@WisprFlow 筹集了 超过 8100 万美元。 每一轮融资的过程都几乎一模一样: 我们埋头在办公室里做产品。 然后某个 VC 直接出现在我们办公室。 “我们需要做什么,才能领投你们的下一轮?” 而这一切发生时,我们甚至都没有在融资。 @apartovi(Neo)是这样。 @hanstung(Notable Capital)是这样。 @mkraning(Menlo Ventures)也是这样。 他们都用明天的估值,来投资今天的公司—— 在我们达成指标之前,在我们做融资 Deck 之前, 甚至在我还没来得及穿上一身正式衣服之前。 大多数投资人需要社会证明: “还有谁投了?” “其他基金怎么说?” 而抢投型(pre-emptive)投资人不一样。 他们来得早、价格给得高, 押的是愿景,而不是当下的数据。 这些,才是你真正想要的投资人。 当局面变得混乱(而且一定会混乱)时, 他们不会恐慌。 他们有独立判断力。 他们是在别人都不相信的时候就已经相信了。 他们不会中途离场。 最好的投资人,不是跟着融资轮走的。 他们,创造融资轮。 we've raised over $81M for @WisprFlow without pitching investors. every round has gone the same way: > we're heads down building. > then a vc shows up at our office. > "what do we need to do to lead your next round?” all while we weren't even raising. @apartovi at neo did this. @hanstung at notable capital did this. @mkraning at menlo ventures did this. they all offered tomorrow's valuation for today's company. before we hit our metrics. before we made a deck. before i even put on a proper outfit. most investors need social proof. "who else is in? what are other firms saying?" pre-emptive investors are different. they show up early, pay premium prices, and bet on vision over metrics. these are the investors you actually want. when shit gets chaotic (and it always does), they don't panic. they have independent conviction. they believed when nobody else did. they’re not going anywhere. the best investors don't follow rounds. they create them.

Tanay KothariCEO at wisprflow.ai

观点原文

我们在没有向投资人路演的情况下,已经为@WisprFlow 筹集了 超过 8100 万美元。

每一轮融资的过程都几乎一模一样:

我们埋头在办公室里做产品。

然后某个 VC 直接出现在我们办公室。

“我们需要做什么,才能领投你们的下一轮?”

而这一切发生时,我们甚至都没有在融资。

@apartovi(Neo)是这样。

@hanstung(Notable Capital)是这样。

@mkraning(Menlo Ventures)也是这样。

他们都用明天的估值,来投资今天的公司——

在我们达成指标之前,在我们做融资 Deck 之前,

甚至在我还没来得及穿上一身正式衣服之前。

大多数投资人需要社会证明:

“还有谁投了?”

“其他基金怎么说?”

而抢投型(pre-emptive)投资人不一样。

他们来得早、价格给得高,

押的是愿景,而不是当下的数据。

这些,才是你真正想要的投资人。

当局面变得混乱(而且一定会混乱)时,

他们不会恐慌。

他们有独立判断力。

他们是在别人都不相信的时候就已经相信了。

他们不会中途离场。

最好的投资人,不是跟着融资轮走的。

他们,创造融资轮。

we've raised over $81M for @WisprFlow without pitching investors.

every round has gone the same way:

> we're heads down building.

> then a vc shows up at our office.

> "what do we need to do to lead your next round?”

all while we weren't even raising.

@apartovi at neo did this.

@hanstung at notable capital did this.

@mkraning at menlo ventures did this.

they all offered tomorrow's valuation for today's company. before we hit our metrics. before we made a deck. before i even put on a proper outfit.

most investors need social proof. "who else is in? what are other firms saying?"

pre-emptive investors are different. they show up early, pay premium prices, and bet on vision over metrics.

these are the investors you actually want.

when shit gets chaotic (and it always does), they don't panic. they have independent conviction. they believed when nobody else did. they’re not going anywhere.

the best investors don't follow rounds.

they create them.

VC

相关观点