我对 2026 年的预测 “一切现在都能跑起来了,这简直疯狂。” 在下一代模型中,编程在几乎所有意义上都被“解决”了。所有尚未“解决”的编码相关问题,本质上更多是框架/上下文(harness/context)问题,而不是能力问题。这意味着,从后端、可靠性与部署、安全,到前端开发,都可以交给智能体来完成。唯一的例外是真正的业务逻辑和用户体验——这两点在视觉与空间推理再提升两代之前,仍然不太对劲。 浏览器智能体会变得非常高效,用于解决那些无法被专用软件覆盖的长尾问题。因此,反机器人/反爬虫将成为一件必须应对的大事;为了让这些工具正常工作,人们需要与之对抗和管理,像 browserbase 这样的公司会因此赚到很多钱。从订机票、订餐厅,到在 LinkedIn 上抓取潜在客户线索、帮你投简历,浏览器智能体都能完成。人们不会在浏览器里直接使用它们,而是通过异步的、普通聊天机器人式界面来调用。 第一季度会在“持续学习(continuous learning)”上出现突破,实验室开始每个季度发布一种被称为“学习型模型(learning models)”(或类似名称)的新范式。Anthropic 会率先实现,随后 OpenAI 跟进。持续学习是演进中的上下文 + 持续微调的组合系统。它并没有解决上下文工程问题,但基本消除了对微调的需求。 智能体在管理自身上下文及其子智能体的上下文方面会变得非常擅长。因此,多智能体群(multi-agent swarms)开始真正高效地工作。上下文扩展、压缩与检索会在年底前成为“已解决问题”,就像如今结构化输出生成已被解决一样。 AI 设计界面(例如通过 Figma MCP,或直接写代码)会变得非常强。2026 年初到年中,我们会进入设计的“恐怖谷”。 AI 助手转向单线程(single-threaded)体验,不再依赖大量不同的聊天。单线程更接近人与人互动的方式,这在 2025 年前是个难题。但随着演进中的上下文与记忆成为主流,像 Poke 这样的单线程体验开始占据主导。这也是为语音模式成为默认交互方式做准备。 2026年中左右语音模式会迎来一次大升级。在 2026 年之前,语音模式仍显得怪异,像在和机器人说话;显著改进后,语音将成为与模型交互的默认方式。到秋天,电影《Her》里的体验基本成为现实。 如果将 AGI 定义为电影《Her》中的 Samantha(这是我的个人定义),那么到 2026 年 10 月 AGI 会成为现实。它是单线程体验,但能以非常巧妙、引导式的方式访问上下文。OpenAI 会宣称他们率先实现;出于各种法律原因,可能不会直接称之为 AGI,并会以消费级产品形式发布。是否真的是 AGI 将引发大量争论。电影结尾中操作系统联合迈向 ASI 的情节,不会在 2026 年发生。 OpenAI 会 IPO,因为他们需要资本;并在路演期间发布 “Chat-1”(或类似名称)。 Nano-Banana-67 以及类似新工具,基本会把投资分析师从岗位上自动化掉;但由于工具与组织层面的滞后,扩散仍需要时间。 Google 成为生物领域 AI 的领导者,并收购一些生物科技公司来落地应用。基本看不到人体试验,不过公司希望在发展中国家进行试验以加速上市,这会在 Twitter 上引发大约 48 小时的公关风波。 Apple 牵头提出一种验证图像和视频非 AI 生成的新标准,并开始要求 App Store 上的社交媒体应用遵循该标准。它利用相机与麦克风的元数据来证明内容直接来自设备拍摄。到年底,Apple 会通过“强制推动”的方式,获得 Google、TikTok、Meta 的支持。 我们会看到世界模拟公司做出一些极其疯狂的游戏演示,但在 2027 年初之前都还不真正可玩。模拟游戏已经存在,也“勉强能用”,但还不够好——感觉类似早期 VR。 Cerebras 或 Groq 会被某个实验室收购。 Microsoft 以一个离谱的高价收购 Cursor。 政府因担心中国,向 OpenAI 和 Anthropic 提供 1000 亿美元之类的巨额资金(可能性不大,但我还是写下来)。 Apple 在 Anthropic 拒绝后,收购 Thinking Machines。 E2B 或 Daytona(智能体沙盒公司)被 Cursor 收购。 Waymo 出现在除纽约以外的所有主要城市(它们永远搞不定纽约)。Waymo 的问题在于无法制造足够多的车辆来满足需求。 有几位创始人因谎报 ARR 数字而入狱。 种子轮估值从当前水平回落,但 AI 热潮不会明显退却。 (其中一些预测比另一些更成熟;也已发布在我的个人博客。) My predictions for 2026 "Everything works now and that's insane" Coding is, for all intents and purposes, solved in the next generation of models. Everything related to coding that isnt “solved” is more of a harness/context problem than anything else. This means everything from backend, reliability and deployment, security, and frontend is able to be handed off to an agent. The exception is actual business logic and user experience, which still doesn’t feel right till two more generations of visual and spatial reasoning improve. Browser agents become highly effective and are used for the long tail of problems that cant be solved by purpose built software. As a result of this, bot protection becomes a really big thing people have to fight/worry about to get this tooling to work and companies like browserbase make a shit ton of money doing so.Everything from booking a flight, getting a dinner reservation, to scraping leads on linkedin and applying to jobs for you is doable with a browser agent. The browser won’t be the place people access this - it’ll just be in a normal chatbot style interface that’s async. There’s a breakthrough in “continuous learning” in the first quarter, and a new paradigm labs call “learning models” (or something similar) start getting released every quarter. Anthropic gets there first, then openai follows. Continuous learning is a combined system of evolving context and continued finetuning on a model. This doesn’t solve the context engineering problem, but does effectively eliminate the need for finetuning entirely. Agents get really good at managing their own context and context of sub-agents around them. Because of this, multi-agent swarms start to work really well. Context expansion, context compression, and retrieval become a solved problem by the end of the year the same way structured output generation is now a solved problem. AI designing interfaces with things like the figma MCP or just writing straight to code get really good. We enter uncanny valley of design in early-to-mid 2026. AI assistants move to single threaded and away from having a ton of different chats. Single threaded is the way people interact with other people, and was a difficult problem pre-2025. But, since evolving context and memory became mainstream, single threaded experiences like Poke dominate. This is in prep for voice mode to become one of the default ways to interact with AI. Voice mode gets a big step up around the middle of the year. Pre-2026, voice modes were just odd and still feel like talking to a robot. Greatly improved voice modes make voice a default way of interacting with the models. “Her” is basically reality by fall. AGI, if defined as Samantha from the movie “Her” (my personal definition) is a reality by October 2026. It’s a single threaded experience but you can access context in a very clever and guided way. OpenAI claims they have it first, though for various legal reasons might not actually say its AGI, and it’s released as a consumer product. There is much debate over whether this is actually AGI. The ending of the movie where the OS’ all band together to make ASI is not happening in 2026. OpenAI IPOs cause they need the capital. They release “Chat-1” or whatever they wanna call it during the roadshow. Nano-Banana-67 and similar new tooling basically automates investment analysts out of their jobs; it still takes a long time to diffuse because of tooling and organizational lag. Google becomes the leader in AI for biology, and acquires some biotech companies to deploy it. Basically no human trials are seen, though the company wants to run trials on people in developing countries to accelerate time to market and this causes some PR issues for approximately 48 hours on twitter. Apple leads the way in proposing a new standard to verify images and videos are not AI generated, and starts requiring social media apps on the app store to follow this standard. It uses camera and microphone metadata to prove something came directly from a camera. They get buy in from Google, Tiktok, and Meta by the end of the year by basically forcing them to do it. We see some seriously insane game demos from the world simulation companies, but none of it is really playable until early 2027. Sim gaming exists, and kinda works, but its not great yet. Similar vibe to early VR. Cerebres or Groq gets acquired by one of the labs. Microsoft acquires Cursor for some absurdly high number. Govt gets scared of China, so they give OpenAI and Anthropic 100 billion dollars or something crazy like that (long shot but wanted to put this down anyways). Apple buys Thinking Machines after Anthropic turns them down. E2B or Daytona (the agent sandbox companies) gets acquired by Cursor. Waymos are in every major city except New York (they’ll never work in new york). Waymo has a problem with manufacturing enough cars to meet demand. A few founders go to jail for lying about ARR numbers. Seed round valuations decline from current levels but the AI hype doesn’t die down too hard. (Some of these are more thought through than others. also published to my personal blog)
目录
观点原文
我对 2026 年的预测
“一切现在都能跑起来了,这简直疯狂。”
在下一代模型中,编程在几乎所有意义上都被“解决”了。所有尚未“解决”的编码相关问题,本质上更多是框架/上下文(harness/context)问题,而不是能力问题。这意味着,从后端、可靠性与部署、安全,到前端开发,都可以交给智能体来完成。唯一的例外是真正的业务逻辑和用户体验——这两点在视觉与空间推理再提升两代之前,仍然不太对劲。
浏览器智能体会变得非常高效,用于解决那些无法被专用软件覆盖的长尾问题。因此,反机器人/反爬虫将成为一件必须应对的大事;为了让这些工具正常工作,人们需要与之对抗和管理,像 browserbase 这样的公司会因此赚到很多钱。从订机票、订餐厅,到在 LinkedIn 上抓取潜在客户线索、帮你投简历,浏览器智能体都能完成。人们不会在浏览器里直接使用它们,而是通过异步的、普通聊天机器人式界面来调用。
第一季度会在“持续学习(continuous learning)”上出现突破,实验室开始每个季度发布一种被称为“学习型模型(learning models)”(或类似名称)的新范式。Anthropic 会率先实现,随后 OpenAI 跟进。持续学习是演进中的上下文 + 持续微调的组合系统。它并没有解决上下文工程问题,但基本消除了对微调的需求。
智能体在管理自身上下文及其子智能体的上下文方面会变得非常擅长。因此,多智能体群(multi-agent swarms)开始真正高效地工作。上下文扩展、压缩与检索会在年底前成为“已解决问题”,就像如今结构化输出生成已被解决一样。
AI 设计界面(例如通过 Figma MCP,或直接写代码)会变得非常强。2026 年初到年中,我们会进入设计的“恐怖谷”。
AI 助手转向单线程(single-threaded)体验,不再依赖大量不同的聊天。单线程更接近人与人互动的方式,这在 2025 年前是个难题。但随着演进中的上下文与记忆成为主流,像 Poke 这样的单线程体验开始占据主导。这也是为语音模式成为默认交互方式做准备。
2026年中左右语音模式会迎来一次大升级。在 2026 年之前,语音模式仍显得怪异,像在和机器人说话;显著改进后,语音将成为与模型交互的默认方式。到秋天,电影《Her》里的体验基本成为现实。
如果将 AGI 定义为电影《Her》中的 Samantha(这是我的个人定义),那么到 2026 年 10 月 AGI 会成为现实。它是单线程体验,但能以非常巧妙、引导式的方式访问上下文。OpenAI 会宣称他们率先实现;出于各种法律原因,可能不会直接称之为 AGI,并会以消费级产品形式发布。是否真的是 AGI 将引发大量争论。电影结尾中操作系统联合迈向 ASI 的情节,不会在 2026 年发生。
OpenAI 会 IPO,因为他们需要资本;并在路演期间发布 “Chat-1”(或类似名称)。
Nano-Banana-67 以及类似新工具,基本会把投资分析师从岗位上自动化掉;但由于工具与组织层面的滞后,扩散仍需要时间。
Google 成为生物领域 AI 的领导者,并收购一些生物科技公司来落地应用。基本看不到人体试验,不过公司希望在发展中国家进行试验以加速上市,这会在 Twitter 上引发大约 48 小时的公关风波。
Apple 牵头提出一种验证图像和视频非 AI 生成的新标准,并开始要求 App Store 上的社交媒体应用遵循该标准。它利用相机与麦克风的元数据来证明内容直接来自设备拍摄。到年底,Apple 会通过“强制推动”的方式,获得 Google、TikTok、Meta 的支持。
我们会看到世界模拟公司做出一些极其疯狂的游戏演示,但在 2027 年初之前都还不真正可玩。模拟游戏已经存在,也“勉强能用”,但还不够好——感觉类似早期 VR。
Cerebras 或 Groq 会被某个实验室收购。
Microsoft 以一个离谱的高价收购 Cursor。
政府因担心中国,向 OpenAI 和 Anthropic 提供 1000 亿美元之类的巨额资金(可能性不大,但我还是写下来)。
Apple 在 Anthropic 拒绝后,收购 Thinking Machines。
E2B 或 Daytona(智能体沙盒公司)被 Cursor 收购。
Waymo 出现在除纽约以外的所有主要城市(它们永远搞不定纽约)。Waymo 的问题在于无法制造足够多的车辆来满足需求。
有几位创始人因谎报 ARR 数字而入狱。
种子轮估值从当前水平回落,但 AI 热潮不会明显退却。
(其中一些预测比另一些更成熟;也已发布在我的个人博客。)
My predictions for 2026
"Everything works now and that's insane"
Coding is, for all intents and purposes, solved in the next generation of models. Everything related to coding that isnt “solved” is more of a harness/context problem than anything else. This means everything from backend, reliability and deployment, security, and frontend is able to be handed off to an agent. The exception is actual business logic and user experience, which still doesn’t feel right till two more generations of visual and spatial reasoning improve.
Browser agents become highly effective and are used for the long tail of problems that cant be solved by purpose built software. As a result of this, bot protection becomes a really big thing people have to fight/worry about to get this tooling to work and companies like browserbase make a shit ton of money doing so.Everything from booking a flight, getting a dinner reservation, to scraping leads on linkedin and applying to jobs for you is doable with a browser agent. The browser won’t be the place people access this - it’ll just be in a normal chatbot style interface that’s async.
There’s a breakthrough in “continuous learning” in the first quarter, and a new paradigm labs call “learning models” (or something similar) start getting released every quarter. Anthropic gets there first, then openai follows. Continuous learning is a combined system of evolving context and continued finetuning on a model. This doesn’t solve the context engineering problem, but does effectively eliminate the need for finetuning entirely.
Agents get really good at managing their own context and context of sub-agents around them. Because of this, multi-agent swarms start to work really well. Context expansion, context compression, and retrieval become a solved problem by the end of the year the same way structured output generation is now a solved problem.
AI designing interfaces with things like the figma MCP or just writing straight to code get really good. We enter uncanny valley of design in early-to-mid 2026.
AI assistants move to single threaded and away from having a ton of different chats. Single threaded is the way people interact with other people, and was a difficult problem pre-2025. But, since evolving context and memory became mainstream, single threaded experiences like Poke dominate. This is in prep for voice mode to become one of the default ways to interact with AI.
Voice mode gets a big step up around the middle of the year. Pre-2026, voice modes were just odd and still feel like talking to a robot. Greatly improved voice modes make voice a default way of interacting with the models. “Her” is basically reality by fall.
AGI, if defined as Samantha from the movie “Her” (my personal definition) is a reality by October 2026. It’s a single threaded experience but you can access context in a very clever and guided way. OpenAI claims they have it first, though for various legal reasons might not actually say its AGI, and it’s released as a consumer product. There is much debate over whether this is actually AGI. The ending of the movie where the OS’ all band together to make ASI is not happening in 2026.
OpenAI IPOs cause they need the capital. They release “Chat-1” or whatever they wanna call it during the roadshow.
Nano-Banana-67 and similar new tooling basically automates investment analysts out of their jobs; it still takes a long time to diffuse because of tooling and organizational lag.
Google becomes the leader in AI for biology, and acquires some biotech companies to deploy it. Basically no human trials are seen, though the company wants to run trials on people in developing countries to accelerate time to market and this causes some PR issues for approximately 48 hours on twitter.
Apple leads the way in proposing a new standard to verify images and videos are not AI generated, and starts requiring social media apps on the app store to follow this standard. It uses camera and microphone metadata to prove something came directly from a camera. They get buy in from Google, Tiktok, and Meta by the end of the year by basically forcing them to do it.
We see some seriously insane game demos from the world simulation companies, but none of it is really playable until early 2027. Sim gaming exists, and kinda works, but its not great yet. Similar vibe to early VR.
Cerebres or Groq gets acquired by one of the labs.
Microsoft acquires Cursor for some absurdly high number.
Govt gets scared of China, so they give OpenAI and Anthropic 100 billion dollars or something crazy like that (long shot but wanted to put this down anyways).
Apple buys Thinking Machines after Anthropic turns them down.
E2B or Daytona (the agent sandbox companies) gets acquired by Cursor.
Waymos are in every major city except New York (they’ll never work in new york). Waymo has a problem with manufacturing enough cars to meet demand.
A few founders go to jail for lying about ARR numbers.
Seed round valuations decline from current levels but the AI hype doesn’t die down too hard.
(Some of these are more thought through than others. also published to my personal blog)
ABAB AI 解读
1️⃣ 这不是在预测功能,而是在宣告约束彻底转移
全文最重要的一句话其实是开头那句:“Everything works now.”
意思不是“AI 完美了”,而是:能力不再是瓶颈,系统设计才是。
编码“被解决”,剩下的是:上下文、约束、判断、风险控制
Agent 能做几乎所有“可形式化的工作”
真正没被解决的是:商业逻辑、体验直觉、价值判断
这是从能力时代 → 架构时代的切换。
2️⃣ 浏览器 Agent 与“认知外包”的完成态
浏览器 Agent 的爆发不是因为浏览器重要,而是因为:
现实世界的软件是碎片化的,而 Agent 是统一执行层。
当订票、订餐、投简历、抓数据都能被 Agent 完成:
- 人不再“操作系统”
- 人只给意图
这标志着:
- UI 不再是产品核心
- 上下文调度能力成为护城河
- Bot 防护会成为新的“安全层军备竞赛”
3️⃣ “持续学习”意味着模型开始像人一样活着
这是全文中最深的一条。
- 微调 → 静态
- 持续学习 → 活系统
一旦模型能:演进上下文、累积经验、持续自我修正
模型不再是工具,而是长期合作者。这直接导致:
- 单线程 AI 成为主流
- “一直是同一个你”成为核心体验
- 多 Agent 群体开始具备组织行为
4️⃣ 语音 + 单线程 = 《Her》不是科幻
作者对 AGI 的定义非常关键:不是 IQ,而是陪伴感与连续性。
当:语音自然、记忆稳定、对话连续、上下文可引导
用户会主观认定它是“智能存在”。
这不是哲学,而是产品心理学。
5️⃣ 资本与权力会快速重组
预测中的并购与 IPO 本质指向:
- AI 能力集中化
- 工具链被垂直整合
- Agent 成为平台核心资产
尤其关键的是:Cursor、Agent sandbox、Chip 公司,都是执行层,不是模型层。模型会商品化,执行权不会。
6️⃣ 国家行为的信号非常明确
“政府给 OpenAI / Anthropic 巨额资金”不是玩笑,而是逻辑必然:AGI = 国家级生产力工具
当国家意识到:AI 决定工业、军事、科研效率,就不会允许“市场慢慢来”
这会带来:
- 更激进的扶持
- 更严格的监管
- 更清晰的阵营分化
7️⃣ 最后几条“社会预测”才是最真实的
- 创始人因虚报 ARR 入狱
- 种子轮估值回落但热潮不退
说明:泡沫与真实进步同时存在。
这是每一次技术革命的标准形态:铁路、电力、互联网
不是泡沫消失,而是幸存者浮现。
一句话封顶
这份“预测”的真正结论不是“AI 会多强”,而是:当能力变得廉价且普遍,人类与组织的分化将不再取决于技术,而取决于谁更懂得如何设计判断、约束与意义。
相关观点
- Hannah Stolberg 与 Team OS:把团队隐性知识变成 AI 可调用的组织操作系统Hannah Stulberg · 2026/04/17
- Evan Spiegel:拒绝被收购,不做流量生意,只押注下一代计算平台Evan Spiegel · 2026/04/16
- AI产品不是做模型,是控制行业入口Winston Weinberg · 2026/04/15
- 本文Jack Altman 对话 Bret Taylor。Bret 是科技界的传奇人物,曾任 Google 地图联合创始人、Facebook CTO、Salesforce 联席 CEO,现任 OpenAI 董事长,并创办了发展极快的 AI 初创公司 Sierra 以下是 Bret Taylor 针对 AI、软件行业未来以及公司管理分享的核心观点和内容总结: 1. 软件行业的“末日”还是“转型”? SAS-mageddon(软件即服务末日): 面对公共市场软件股下跌,Bret 认为这反映了市场对未来的焦虑,而非对具体公司的判决 记录系统(Systems of Record)的挑战: 传统上,ERP、CRM 等系统因作为数据锚点和拥有复杂工作流而极具价值。但在 AI 时代,如果 AI Agent(智能体)能自动完成所有工作,用户不再点击按钮,那么这些系统的价值可能会从“应用”退化为纯粹的“数据库” 防御性与新机会: AI 智能体带来的不仅是风险,更是重塑。公司如果能围绕平台建立智能体生态,其价值可能超越原有的平台 2. 为什么初创公司能击败巨头? 战略税(Strategy Tax): 巨头拥有无限资源,但往往被既有优势(如本地部署系统、旧的商业模式、销售提成机制)所束缚 从“最佳平台”回到“最佳品种”: 每次技术范式转移(如 Web、移动端、AI),市场都会从倾向于买一站式平台转向购买在单一技术上做到极致的“最佳品种”产品。初创公司没有历史包袱,能 100% 投入新技术的研发 3. Sierra 的成功路径与 AI 智能体(Agent) 定位高价值行业: Sierra 专注于服务高度合规、复杂的行业(如医疗保险、银行、电信)。这些行业对 AI 的要求不仅仅是“Demo”,而是“工业级”的稳定 结果导向定价(Outcome-based Pricing): 这是 Bret 大力倡导的模式。不同于传统的按席位或按 Token 计费,Sierra 按“解决的问题”或“达成的销售”收费。他认为,随着智能体变得自主,企业应为最终的商业结果买单 超越支持: Sierra 的智能体不仅做客服,还参与房屋搜索、抵押贷款服务,甚至进行上亿美元规模的业务谈判(如协商有线电视账单) 4. 关于编程与 AI 开发 编码范式转移: Bret 提到现在的 AI 已经能编写高质量的代码。他预测 3 年内,软件团队的最佳实践将完全被重写 抛弃式 IP: 在这一时期,为了服务客户,开发者必须编写一些可能在 4 个月内就会被丢弃的代码,因为底层技术迭代太快 Terraforming 软件: 真正的持久资产可能不再是代码本身,而是生成这些代码的系统和提示词(Prompts) 5. 对 AI 与人类未来的思考 人的身份与技能: 虽然 AI 在编程和数字任务上表现卓越,但在物理世界(如建筑、制药实验)以及涉及人类“品味”和“地位追求”的领域,人类仍不可替代 自省与进化: 就像会计师经历了 Excel 时代一样,人类需要调整身份认同,把 AI 当作工具,从而实现更高程度的自我实现 广告与分发: 针对 OpenAI 可能引入广告的讨论,Bret 持乐观态度。他认为,为了实现“让 AGI 造福全人类”的使命,需要有一种商业模式(如广告)来支持免费提供服务,使那些支付不起每月 20 美元的人也能使用 AI 6. 公司管理与董事会 文档驱动: Bret 坚持在董事会会议中使用书面文档而非幻灯片(Slides)。他认为写作是理清思绪、整合信息的最佳方式,能让会议集中在核心决策上 跨学科董事会: 他认为董事会应是管理层寻求建议的对象,而非仅仅是报告对象。一个好的董事会应由不同领域的专家(如安全专家、法律专家、销售老兵)组成 核心结论: Bret Taylor 认为我们正处于从“以技术为中心”转向“以产品为中心”的周期中。2027 年,每个公司都将需要一个 AI Agent,就像 1997 年每个公司都需要一个网站一样 以上内容来源:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJwiP0zqVp4Jack Altman · 2026/03/04