@MartinShkreli 对“金融公司会迅速用 AI 替代员工”这种叙事持怀疑态度。 “如果你在工作中变得更高效，公司不会说，‘哦，那我们把你裁了，省下这笔钱。’ 公司本来就因为你在岗而赚钱。你变得更高效，意味着原本的利润率很可能在提高。” “作为人类，我们希望雇佣其他人，也希望变得更有生产力。没人愿意无谓地养人，但现在有一种想法是——机器可以做你的工作。我们公司就有这种情况。我会对 Chris 说，‘我写了个程序可以做你的工作。好消息是，你不用再做这个了，但现在有一项新的工作等着你。’ 于是公司效率翻了一倍。这很棒。” “如果那个人每天因此多出几个小时，那太好了。他可以去见潜在的招聘对象，或者去见潜在客户。总有事情可以做。” “在金融行业，AI 的采用速度一直很慢，而且可能会继续如此。金融行业的人习惯固守自己的方式，这既是好事也是坏事。如果你是卖软件的，一旦他们习惯了你的系统，你会很开心。但某些行业确实有一种很强的逆向思维文化。我认为在标普500企业中，普遍存在一种态度：‘技术——我们最终会用的。’” .@MartinShkreli is skeptical of the narrative that finance companies will rush to replace employees with AI. “If you become more productive at work, the company doesn’t say, ‘Oh, let’s get rid of you and save whatever amount of money.' They’re already making money with you employed. The fact that you’re becoming more productive means that whatever the margins were, they’re probably improving.” “We as humans want to employ other humans, and we want to be productive. Nobody wants to needlessly employ people, but I think that there's this idea of - a machine can do your job. We have this at my office. I say, ‘Chris, I wrote a program to do your job. Good news, you don’t have to do it anymore, but there’s a new thing you have to do now.’ And our company just got twice as efficient. It’s wonderful.” “If that person has a couple more hours a day now, great. They can go meet with potential recruits or go meet with some potential customers. There’s always something you can do.” “In finance, adoption of AI has been very slow, and it’s probably going to stay that way. Finance people are stuck in their ways, which is a good thing and a bad thing. If you’re selling software to them, once they get stuck in their way, you’re very happy. But there tends to be a heavy dose of contrarianism in certain industries. And I’d say across the S&P 500, there’s this sort of, ‘technology - we’ll use it eventually.’”