哎呀,末日派又遭遇一次大惨败。连纽约喷气机队这个赛季表现都比他们好……也许明年再努力吧。 Oh man another big L for the Doomers. Even the NY Jets are having better season.. maybe next year
Eric BalchunasSenior ETF Analyst for Bloomberg
观点原文
哎呀,末日派又遭遇一次大惨败。连纽约喷气机队这个赛季表现都比他们好……也许明年再努力吧。
Oh man another big L for the Doomers. Even the NY Jets are having better season.. maybe next year
ABAB AI 解读
🔍 一句话总结
他是在嘲讽“末日论者”(Doomers)——就是那些每天预测经济要崩盘、股市要暴跌、美国要衰落的人。今天 S&P 500 大涨,他借机说这些人又输了一次。
🧠 逐句拆解含义
“Oh man another big L for the Doomers.”
L = Loss(输、丢脸)
意思是:“哎呀,末日派又输了一大局。”
Doomers 指天天说“经济完了”、“市场会崩盘”的那群人。
市场今天大涨 → 所以他们又被打脸。
“Even the NY Jets are having better season.. maybe next year”
NY Jets = 纽约喷气机队,是 NFL 最差球队之一,常年战绩烂,被拿来当笑话。
他说这句话的意思是:“末日派今年太惨了,连纽约喷气机队的赛季表现都比他们好。明年再努力吧(笑)。”
这是带嘲讽 + 幽默的金融圈话术:
“你们预测崩盘预测一年了,结果市场越涨越高。”
📈 为什么今天他会这样说?
S&P 500 今天在 FOMC 后大涨(是 3 月以来最强的 FOMC 日表现)
Bloomberg AI 的摘要说:
- 美联储加息如预期
- 鲍威尔称经济有韧性
- S&P 500 上涨 0.7%,接近历史新高
- 小盘股(R2000)大涨 1.3%
- 市场对经济前景乐观
也就是说:
🔥 市场拥抱风险资产 → 股市全面向好 → “末日派”再次被打脸
💬 总结成一句简单的人话:
“那些天天喊股市要跌、经济要崩的人又输了。现在连联盟最烂的球队纽约喷气机都比他们表现好。哈哈,明年再来吧。”
这是典型的 华尔街风格调侃:行情越好,末日派越被嘲笑。
ETFUS Stocks
相关观点
- 这篇专栏文章把整整一年的调子都写进去了。 标题喊得响亮,说他在“抛售美国资产”、“把钱撤出美股”。 好吧,虽然我不同意,但至少看上去像是走“Burry 式”极端路线。 结果到了第 18 段,他又说: “我可不是叫你卖美股,它仍占我投资组合的 35%,而且它依然最强、长期大概率会继续碾压。” 笑死。 故事的寓意: a)别太当真专栏作者的戏剧化表达; b)阅读外面的内容要谨慎,很多东西并不是它看起来的样子。 我确实欣赏他愿意谈自己的投资组合——我真希望更多专栏作者也能这样做。 比如说,如果你声称“被动投资或 ETF 正在毁掉资本主义”,那我就很想知道你自己的个人账户(PA)里到底都买了什么。 This column captures the entire year. Headline is all loud and proud how he's selling America, "moving money out of US stocks" Ok, fine, I don't agree, but at least he's walking walk Burry-style. But then in paragraph 18 he's like "I'm not saying sell US stocks, they are 35% of my port and they rule and will likely crush long term" lol. Moral of the story: a) never go full columnist and b) be careful reading stuff out there, things are rarely what they appear I do appreciate that he talks about his own portfolio, I would love to see this more from columnists. So like if you say passive or ETFs is ruining capitalism, I would love to know what is in your PAEric Balchunas · 2025/12/09
- 比特币和郁金香都属于“无生产性资产(non-productive assets)”。但黄金也是、毕加索的画也是、稀有邮票也是 ——难道你会把这些都拿去和郁金香比较吗? 并不是所有资产都必须“能产生收益”才有价值。 更重要的是,郁金香的特征是: 短暂的狂热,然后崩盘。结束。 完全不是同一种东西。 bitcoin and tulips are both non-productive assets. But so is gold, so is a picasso painting, rare stamps- would you compare those to tulips? Not all assets have to "be productive" to be valuable. But even beyond that Tulips were marked by euphoria and crash. And that's it. Dif animal.Eric Balchunas · 2025/12/06
- 如果你回顾一下比特币今年的表现,其实到目前为止发生的事情只是:它把去年那些“极度超涨”的部分回吐了一些而已。 去年比特币上涨了 122%,几乎把所有资产都“打爆了”,涨幅是所有品类的 5 倍。 所以即使 2025 年最终收在持平,或是小幅下跌,它依然是在运行自己 每年平均约 50% 的长期增长轨迹。 资产偶尔降温一下是正常的——股票也是这样。在我看来,现在很多人对比特币的反应都过度解读了。 If you think about bitcoin's year, all that really happened (at least up to this point) is it gave up the extreme excess of last year. It rose +122% and was 5x everything under sun. So even if 2025 ends up flat or moderately down year and it's still operating at its 50%-ish ann avg. Assets are allowed to cool off once in a while, even stocks. People overanalyzing it IMO.Eric Balchunas · 2025/12/06
- 我个人之所以不会把比特币拿去和“郁金香”比较(无论跌得多惨),原因如下: 郁金香泡沫从上涨到崩盘只持续了大约 3 年。被打了一拳就直接被 KO。 而比特币从历史上大概 经历了 6–7 次“重拳暴击” 后依然能回到历史新高,并且已经生存了 17 年。光是这种“耐久度”,就足以让人放弃“郁金香”这种类比。 更别说,它 过去 3 年仍涨了约 250%,去年一年还涨了 122%。 事实是,有些人就是讨厌这种资产,他们喜欢激怒那些喜欢比特币的人。这种情况大概率永远不会变。 Here's why I personally would not compare bitcoin to tulips (no matter how bad the selloff). Tulips rose and collapsed in like 3yrs. Punched once in face and KO'd. Bitcoin has comeback from like 6-7 haymakers to reach ATHs and has survived 17yrs. The endurance alone warrants shedding Tulip comp, let alone the fact that it's STILL up like 250% past 3yrs and was up 122% last year. The thing is some ppl just hate this asset and want to enrage the ppl who like it. That will prob never change.Eric Balchunas · 2025/12/06