政府一直在关键基础设施建设中发挥着重要作用。我们在博客上公开的提案中，分享了我们的思考，并提出了一些建议——说明美国政府可以如何支持本土供应链与制造业的发展。 这与我们从政府方面听到的优先事项完全一致。我们认为，美国在整个产业链上重新实现再工业化——从晶圆厂、涡轮机、变压器到钢铁等多个领域——不仅将惠及我们所在的行业，也会让其他行业（包括我们自己）受益。 如果政府愿意采取行动，以确保国内供应链的稳定，那是件好事。这是一项合理且有意义的国家政策。 但这与为 OpenAI 提供贷款担保完全是两回事——我们希望这一点能够被明确理解。这样的政策将有利于整个国家、多个产业，以及这些产业中的所有参与者。 The government has played a role in critical infrastructure builds. Our public submission (posted on our blog) shares our thinking and suggests ideas for how the US government can support domestic supply chain/manufacturing. This is very in line with everything we have heard from the government about their priorities. We think US reindustrialization across the entire stack--fabs, turbines, transformers, steel, and much more--will help everyone in our industry, and other industries (including us). To the degree the government wants to do something to help ensure a domestic supply chain, great. This is part of a national policy that makes sense to me. But that's super different than loan guarantees to OpenAI, and we hope that's clear. It would be good for the whole country, many industries, and all players in those industries.