A study covering 41 countries found that companies adopting AI are overall increasing recruitment, but the new positions are mainly senior roles, while employment for junior positions is actually decreasing. Researchers concluded: "In occupations with high AI exposure, AI saves labor for junior employees but expands labor for senior employees."

The research was conducted by Bharat Chandar from Stanford University and Bouke Klein Teeselink from King's College London, with data spanning from January 2021 to March 2026. The sample includes 1.25 billion job postings and 154 million employment records provided by labor data company Revelio Labs, covering 41 countries including Brazil, Saudi Arabia, the UK, and the US. The study grouped companies based on AI adoption and compared personnel changes at different levels between the two groups.

The core result is that over five years, employment in senior positions at AI-adopting companies grew by 6.7%, while employment in junior positions decreased by about 2.5% to 3%. The proportion of junior employees in the total workforce declined by about 2 percentage points. Overall, the number of employees in companies grew by about 3.3%, but this was statistically only marginally significant. In terms of occupational structure, senior employees moved to AI-exposed positions by 0.9 percentage points, while junior employees moved out by 0.6 percentage points. The most impacted were computer and mathematics positions: these roles increased by 0.8 percentage points in AI companies, but the increase was almost entirely in senior levels, with the decline in junior proportions being the largest among all occupations.

Looking at individual countries, among the 31 countries with data, the proportion of junior employees declined in 23 countries, with significant declines in the US, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia. Data on young workers is even more telling: in AI-exposed occupations, employment levels for 22 to 25-year-olds are now 19% lower than expected, and this gap is widening.

Other data points in the same direction. Research from Hiring Lab, a subsidiary of job site Indeed, shows that in May 2026, job postings for senior positions increased by 14.7% year-on-year, while entry-level positions decreased by 7.5%. Venture capital firm SignalFire reported a 65% reduction in entry-level recruitment among 12 major tech companies since 2019. PwC's 2026 Global AI Employment Outlook found that among AI-exposed positions, 52% of newly emerging entry-level skill requirements involve "strategic judgment, leadership, and decision-making," abilities that were originally associated with senior employees are now being included in entry-level job requirements.

At the corporate level, KPMG UK reduced its graduate recruitment from 1,399 to 942, while Deloitte, EY, and PwC also reduced graduate hiring to varying degrees. There are also companies taking the opposite approach: IBM plans to triple its entry-level recruitment in the US by 2026, citing the need to maintain a long-term talent pipeline.

From a market mechanism perspective, this is a technology-driven adjustment of the labor structure. Companies, as buyers of labor, are shifting their labor budgets originally allocated for a large number of junior employees towards AI tool subscriptions, computing power, and a few high-paid senior employees. The flow of funds is: labor costs are converted into AI software and cloud service revenues, while simultaneously pushing up the salary premium for senior talent. Beneficiaries include AI model and enterprise software suppliers, experienced and judicious senior employees, and shareholders of companies that can expand output with fewer human resources. Those under pressure include fresh graduates, the outsourcing and professional services industries primarily focused on junior positions, and industries like consulting, accounting, and law that rely on a "pyramid structure" to cultivate talent for long-term supply.

Source: Public Information