Australia Allows Investment Property Losses to Offset Wage Tax
Australia allows losses from rental investment properties (where interest, depreciation, and property expenses exceed rental income) to directly offset taxable income from other sources (such as wages). This mechanism has existed for a long time, benefiting high-income taxpayers more significantly.
Negative gearing dates back to the 1930s Income Tax Assessment Act, aimed at encouraging housing investment. The Hawke government briefly isolated losses in 1985, prohibiting offsets against wage income, but restored it in 1987. It has continued to apply since then, with little change expected before the 2026 budget.
The budget announced on May 12, 2026, will implement reforms starting July 1, 2027. For existing residential investment properties purchased after 7:30 PM on May 12, 2026, losses can only offset income from other residential properties or capital gains, and cannot offset wages. New properties and properties held before the announcement will be protected by grandfathering clauses and can still offset other income.
Accompanying measures include capital gains tax discounts being changed to inflation-indexed with a minimum tax rate of 30% starting July 1, 2027. The Treasury's modeling estimates an impact on rents of about AUD 2 per week, with a short-term slowdown in property price growth of about 2%.
Analysis from the Grattan Institute and others shows that the benefits of negative gearing flow more to high-income groups. ATO data previously indicated that about 6% of taxpayers claimed negative gearing. The reform aims to shift incentives towards new supply while protecting existing holders.
In terms of market mechanisms, high marginal tax rate investors create paper losses through leveraged property purchases to reduce taxes while holding assets for appreciation. Beneficiaries include high-income existing investors and new investors, while those under pressure are new entrants relying on existing property investments and potential rental supply.
Source: Public Information
ABAB AI Insight
Negative gearing was introduced in 1936 and was isolated by the Hawke government from 1985 to 1987 before being restored. The 2026 budget again restricts the deduction of losses for newly purchased existing properties while retaining exemptions for new builds and grandfathering for existing holdings, continuing the trend of policy adjustments.
In terms of capital pathways, high-income earners purchase investment properties through bank leverage, using losses to reduce wage tax, thereby lowering after-tax costs while waiting for capital gains. Resource allocation is concentrated in the existing housing market rather than forcing new supply.
This is similar to tax arrangements in other countries that allow investment losses to offset other income. The current transition is from universal deductions to distinguishing between new and existing properties, with policies attempting to shift incentives from competition for existing stock to increasing new supply.
Essentially, this is a regulatory change. By linking investment losses to wage income, it increases the holding capacity and leverage willingness of high-tax-rate individuals; after limiting deductions, the after-tax returns on existing property investments decrease, shifting pricing power partially from leveraged investors to owner-occupier demand and new supply.
ABAB News · Cognitive Law
Losses can offset taxes; leverage is a tax shield.
Incentives favor existing stock; supply may not necessarily increase.
High-tax-rate individuals benefit first; reforms initially target incremental changes.