Back to Flash News

Trump on Thursday night said voters should be blamed for the historic sell-off in U.S. stocks

U.S. President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social on Thursday night, attributing the sharp drop in U.S. stocks that day to the results of Tuesday’s midterm elections. He said that the stock market crashed that day because the Democrats had a big Tuesday, adding that it was sad to see and that voters only had themselves to blame.

Trump also posted that the stock market had experienced one of the worst days in history based on the election results, said that 401(k)s had therefore fallen, and emphasized that it was not Republicans but Democrats. The Dow fell 1,833 points (3.44%) that day, the Nasdaq fell 5.52%, and the S&P 500 fell 4.36%, with tech and AI-related stocks leading the declines. The market worried that after Democrats gained control of Congress, regulation of AI infrastructure and data centers could be tightened.

The market had rebounded on Wednesday because of the election results, and Trump had then taken credit for the market’s high. Thursday’s sell-off erased the previous day’s gains, and the Nasdaq entered correction territory. Trump said the market would eventually become bigger and stronger, but did not provide specific policy details.

Original source:

  1. Title: Trump blames voters for stock market rout
    Publisher: Axios
    Publication date: 2026-11-05
    URL: https://www.axios.com/2026/11/06/trump-stock-market-sell-off
    Source nature: media report (quoting the original Truth Social post)
    Verification status: The original text was read and the quotes and market data were cross-checked against reports from Fox Business, Forbes, Mediaite and others
    Supporting content: Trump said voters should blame themselves, that Democrats caused the sell-off, that 401(k)s fell, and the specific declines in the Dow and Nasdaq

ABAB AI Insight

Trump directly linked Thursday’s sell-off to the results of Tuesday’s midterm elections, saying that voters’ support for Democrats caused the market to fall. The market’s actual reaction had a lag: after the election results became clear on Wednesday, the market rebounded, and Trump then took credit for the high; on Thursday, however, it fell sharply amid concerns that Democratic control of both chambers could lead to tighter regulation of AI and data centers, with tech and semiconductor stocks leading the declines.

This statement draws a direct causal connection between the election results and market volatility, but the day’s sell-off was concentrated mainly in AI-related stocks. The market’s discussion centered on regulatory uncertainty and limits on data center expansion rather than broad economic policy. Trump also mentioned the decline in 401(k)s, linking personal retirement accounts to the election results, but did not provide specific data to support it.

In terms of capital flows, the market rose first and then fell after the election, showing that the initial reaction and the later repricing of policy details were not synchronized. After Democrats won control of Congress, investors’ expectations for the pace of AI infrastructure investment and the regulatory environment changed, putting pressure on related sectors. Trump’s post placed the blame on voters and Democrats rather than on specific policy proposals or company fundamentals.

Structurally, this was a public statement attributing short-term market volatility to the election results. When the market reacted to potential regulatory changes, the election winners were directly identified as the cause of the sell-off. The post also included an expectation that the market would recover in the future, but did not specify a mechanism or timeline.

ABAB News · Cognitive laws

  1. After the election results became clear, the market first rebounded and then pulled back because of regulatory expectations, showing a lag between initial pricing and later repricing.

  2. Directly attributing the sell-off to voters’ choices publicly links political outcomes with asset price volatility.

  3. The decline in AI-related sectors reflects specific market concerns about regulation of data centers and infrastructure, rather than a broad deterioration in fundamentals.