Request Finance
Request Finance: Tax, reporting, or accounting resource for crypto assets.
ABAB Structured Brief
Request Finance is indexed in ABAB Crypto Map under Tax & Accounting. This page keeps the official site, category, tags, and related ABAB coverage together as a searchable crypto project profile. Official domain: request.finance.
Related News & Analysis
Social Worker Claims Hospital Used AI to Increase Patient Bill from $85,000 to $102,000
...rges and identified additional fees through AI scanning. He requested specific details regarding the new charges and the corresponding services and dates during a call. The patient had previously stated they could ...
OpenAI Codex Head Tibo Publicly States Team Chooses 300k as Codex Default Context Length
..., but will significantly increase the quota consumption per request, especially after exceeding about 272k, triggering higher billing rates. Users can actively choose a larger window through configuration, while th...
Cognition Supports ChatGPT Personal Subscription Payment for Devin's GPT Usage
...uota. After connecting, enabling token sharing allows requests made by Devin on behalf of users to be deducted from the ChatGPT plan usage, without counting against Devin's own quota or on-demand limits. This featu...
CryptoBilis Suspends All Channel Hardware Wallet Sales in Malaysia, Philippines, and Indonesia
...ers who purchased devices from this distributor. Ledger has requested CryptoBilis to suspend the sale and shipment of its Ledger devices, stating that its own systems, infrastructure, and services are unaffected. C...
a16z Closed-Door Debate: From Existential Risk (X-Risk) Regulatory Traps, Internal Network Agent Protection to New Paradigms in Probabilistic Programming
1. Core Controversy: "Pacing" or Regulatory Capture? • The open letter from Anthropic founder Dario Amodei has sparked intense debate in the industry: • The frontier large model safety and sandbox isolation initiative proposed by Dario and others is reasonable at the pure technical engineering level; • However, the focus of the controversy lies in the narrative packaging of "pacing" and the so-called "existential risk (X-Risk)". • The logical flaw of the concept of "pacing": • Lack of a reference frame: There has never been a publicly agreed benchmark speed for technological evolution. Announcing "we have decided to slow down" when no one knows the original completion node is essentially similar to the media claiming "the unannounced Apple car has been delayed," which lacks measurable standards for a self-consistent narrative. • A middle ground that pleases neither side: Attempting to walk a compromise between the internal extreme pause faction (Pause/Doomer) and external regulatory bodies has resulted in radicals accusing it of "just slowing down instead of stopping," while regulators deem it as "acknowledging the existence of harm yet still racing ahead." • Reflecting on the moral coercion of "existential risk (X-Risk)": • Historically, nuclear weapons development teams were well aware of their absolute lethality on a physical level, thus establishing the highest level of national control mechanisms; • If the heads of large model laboratories genuinely believe there is a 10% probability of human extinction, the only ethical response would be a complete halt or total nationalization; • The reality is contradictory: If one side portrays extinction risk while continuing to accelerate financing and pushing into the commercial market, it can easily be exploited by politicians, leading to excessive regulatory capture that could strangle startups and the open-source ecosystem. 2. Historical Reflection: From Nuclear Bombs, Early Internet Viruses to Regulatory Lag • Prerequisites of the "Fact Pattern" in policy-making: • The automotive industry was already widespread in the early 20th century, and it wasn't until Ralph Nader published "Unsafe at Any Speed" in the 1960s that stringent safety regulations were formed; • The aviation industry experienced a 40-year period of technical trial and error from the Wright brothers' first flight to the establishment of a complete FAA airworthiness certification system; • Traditional regulation must be based on specific damages that have occurred and a clear causal chain; attempting to implement "predictive legislation" before technology has matured is almost certain to stifle innovation. • If we were to apply today's fear paradigm to the Internet of the 1990s, it would never have emerged: • In the era of Windows 95 and early PCs, connected computers faced widespread risks from worm viruses and network interruptions (for example, the Morris worm paralyzed 10% of backbone networks, leading to frequent disconnections and business losses); • At that time, Congress passed the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) targeting specific system intrusion cases; if the Internet's underlying infrastructure had been completely locked down in 1994 out of fear of hackers, the modern digital economy would not exist. • The potential spread risk of the European GDPR model: • Europe, lacking local underlying tech giants, tends to legislate aggressively in compliance and antitrust areas; • Beware of Europe refining regulation into a "digital airbag reminder" for AI Agents—where every time an Agent calls an external API or performs file read/write, a GDPR-like disclaimer confirmation box pops up, ultimately leading to widespread user cognitive numbness. 3. The Real New Security Front: Engineering Threats from the Emergence of Internal Network Agents • The complete failure of traditional internal network security assumptions: • Past IT and enterprise information security were based on an implicit assumption: 95%-99% of internal employees comply with regulations most of the time, with malicious insiders being a very low probability event. • Internal GitHub, Slack, approval flows, and financial reimbursement systems often lack strict concurrency throttling, relying solely on single sign-on (SSO) and coarse-grained identity authentication. • Agent swarms as "internal network distributed denial-of-service attacks (DDoS)": • When internal employees start to batch schedule thousands of autonomous Agents to write code, call APIs, and run automated tests, the software behavior is structurally identical to high-frequency DDoS attacks. • Agents possess rapid retry and tireless characteristics, easily exhausting internal microservice resources in a dead loop, and may even trigger dangerous data overwrites due to misunderstanding instructions. • Next-generation operating systems and permission granularity innovation: • The existing operating system permission system is too crude (either fully open or frequently prompting for confirmation); • There is an urgent need to reconstruct the underlying security stack to support fine-grained dynamic permission isolation (e.g., instantaneous read/write control for specific folders, adaptive API rate monitoring, and audit tracking), shifting the security focus from the metaphysical level of species survival back to concrete engineering defenses. 4. Paradigm Shift: The Rise of the Jev Model and the Return of Probabilistic Programming • The essential conflict between natural language interaction and traditional software systems: • The industry has previously focused on a "text input, text output" chat model, but forcing structured software to parse unstructured long text is extremely costly and error-prone; • Relying on complex prompt constraints and schema validation cannot guarantee 100% deterministic output and wastes enormous computational costs and response delays on meaningless question-and-answer redundancy. • The core breakthrough of the Jev model: from "generating text" to "semantic decision-making": • The input remains semantic context, but the output completely abandons generative text; • Among a given set of discrete options or routing conditions, it directly returns the optimal decision and precise probability distribution with extremely high throughput and low latency; • This completely overturns inefficient chat box interactions, allowing traditional software code to directly use large model outputs as the basis for logical branching decisions. • The revival of half a century of computer science legacy: • The core proposition of programming languages in the early 1960s-1970s was simulation and probabilistic modeling (e.g., handling ballistic trajectories, wind fluctuations, and other non-deterministic physical systems); • Modern software code has long been limited to Boolean algebra (absolute certainty of if/else); • With the implementation of Jev-like architectures, the core programming paradigm is shifting entirely to condition branches based on probabilistic confidence (if x% then ...), seamlessly integrating probabilistic language models with classical deterministic software engineering. 5. The Shift of Innovation Focus: From the Base Model Layer to the Model Periphery • The "critical mass dilemma" at the giant platform layer: • Leading large model laboratories are currently mired in maintaining large infrastructure operations, resolving alignment disputes, and managing massive user compatibility, severely dispersing their focus, making it difficult to optimize all vertical scenarios from the platform layer. • The autonomous evolution of application layers and peripheral tools: • The history of the software industry shows that core innovations often emerge outside the platform (analogous to the "Sherlocking" process where third-party independent tools are integrated into systems); • Large models are no longer merely revered as ultimate deities but are evolving into standard underlying components like databases and compilers; the core technological moat of future software is shifting entirely to how to reconstruct contextual systems, state persistence, and high-reliability business flows around the model's periphery.
Vercel CEO Guillermo Rauch in Conversation with Supabase: From Pixels to Tokens, Progressive Disclosure of Complexity and the Evolution of AI Cloud Architecture
"Fireside Chat with Guillermo Rauch Supabase Select 2025" (Supabase Select Summit Fireside Chat, featuring Vercel founder and CEO Guillermo Rauch / @rauchg), here are the key points summarized: 1. Open Source & Monetization • Developer Experience (DX) is consuming infrastructure: From early development of Mongoose, Socket.io to founding Next.js, modern databases and infrastructure cannot just provide bare instances to users; they must offer excellent full-stack, out-of-the-box DX (driving layers, framework integration, and workflow monitoring). • Non-zero-sum game capitalism logic: Open source and commercialization are not opposed. By growing the Next.js pie and making it the default standard for building web applications, Vercel can share in the commercialization; the ample funds obtained can then be reinvested into open source projects to ensure 24/7 response to CVE security vulnerabilities and technological iterations. 2. Product Philosophy: Progressive Disclosure of Complexity • Day 0 / Day 1 ultimate experience: • In the era of AI programming (like v0, Cursor, etc.), developers (and even AI Agents) have extremely high expectations for tools. The setup of databases or computing power must be completed within seconds, with calls requiring only a few lines of code or very few tokens. • Day 0 concept: Become the default base before developers conceive projects (like the deep integration between Supabase and Vercel), avoiding the "Duckling Syndrome" that leads to fixed choices. • Day 1,000 scalability: Many startup products are only good for "weekend prototypes," but are abandoned by users when it comes to handling larger data, enterprise-level compliance, and complex workflows. Excellent products must maintain Day 1 simplicity while gradually releasing underlying advanced capabilities as needed. 3. Vercel's New Chapter: From Pixels to Tokens • Transition from Frontend Cloud to AI Cloud: • Over the past decade, Vercel has focused on creating the fastest front-end pixels and ultimate UI experiences (like Next.js, shadcn/ui, etc.). • With the penetration of AI, many future software will have "Invisible Interfaces." Users only need to provide high-level goals, while the backend consumes a large number of tokens to collaboratively complete complex orchestration. • Core infrastructure layout for AI: • AI Gateway (Token CDN): Similar to how CDNs solved static resource distribution, AI Gateway is responsible for handling intelligent routing, disaster recovery fallback, retries, and caching for multiple model vendors. • Sandbox (Agent's EC2): A secure isolated execution environment and virtual machine for Agents (long-running CLI tools will be launched soon). • Event-driven and durable workflows: For Agent scenarios like Deep Research that last for hours, providing support for interruption recovery and checkpoint continuation. 4. Founder Spirit, Team Management, and Execution • Talent standards IGI (Intelligence, Grindset, Integrity): • As an immigrant from Argentina, he understands that breaking barriers requires strong resilience and a grindset mentality. • Ideal team members possess three elements: Intelligence (high intelligence), Grindset (extreme effort), Integrity (high integrity). • There are only two roles in the company: At Vercel, everyone must either be "Close to the code" or "Close to the customer." • Iteration speed and skepticism (Stay Sus): • Pursue "directional high-speed iteration." • Founders maintain daily personal QA and a "sus" attitude towards products, always assuming that products are not usable in specific extreme scenarios, thus forcing the team to continuously refine edge details. 5. Language and Communication: Core Skills of Technical Leaders • Communication is a hard skill: Influenced by Argentine literature and Borges, he has long focused on the study of language and precise expression. • The return of language value in the prompt era: With the rise of AI and prompt engineering, precise high-quality language communication, abstract expression ability, and solid mathematical foundation are equally important.