这太蠢了。真的很蠢。非常、非常蠢。 为什么?因为在《平价医疗法案》(ACA)下,把这笔钱给保险公司,他们至少必须把 85% 用于为参保人提供医疗服务。 但是如果把钱直接放进人们的 HSA(健康储蓄账户),就无法保证这笔钱会被用于医疗支出。 领取者可以把这笔钱存起来,然后在 65 岁 时全部取出。 更可能的情况是,人们拿到 HSA 的钱后,立刻全额取出,支付 20% 的罚金,然后随便买自己想要的任何东西。 所以你的税金可能会被用来办派对! 这是不是意味着我喜欢把补贴给大型保险公司?不。 这意味着有比这更好的方式。 无论我们采取什么方案,纳税人的钱必须直接用于支付或保障必要的医疗服务。 把钱打进人们的 HSA —— 真的非常蠢。 This is dumb. Really dumb. Really Really Dumb. Why? Because when you give it to Ins Carriers under the ACA, they have to spend at least 85pct of it on care for plan holders. When sent to people's HSAs, there is no assurance that the money will be spent on healthcare costs at all. A recipient can save the money and take it out when they turn 65. MORE LIKELY , people will get that HSA cash, immediately take it out, pay the 20 pct penalty and buy whatever they want So your tax dollars could be throwing parties ! Does this mean I like the subsidies going to the big insurance carriers ? No. It means there are better ways to do this. Whatever we do, taxpayer money HAS TO GO DIRECTLY TOWARDS PAYING or Guaranteeing NECESSARY MEDICAL CARE. Sending money to people's HSAs is really dumb

Mark CubanEntrepreneur & Investor

观点原文

这太蠢了。真的很蠢。非常、非常蠢。

为什么?因为在《平价医疗法案》(ACA)下,把这笔钱给保险公司,他们至少必须把 85% 用于为参保人提供医疗服务。

但是如果把钱直接放进人们的 HSA(健康储蓄账户),就无法保证这笔钱会被用于医疗支出。

领取者可以把这笔钱存起来,然后在 65 岁 时全部取出。

更可能的情况是,人们拿到 HSA 的钱后,立刻全额取出,支付 20% 的罚金,然后随便买自己想要的任何东西。

所以你的税金可能会被用来办派对!

这是不是意味着我喜欢把补贴给大型保险公司?不。

这意味着有比这更好的方式。

无论我们采取什么方案,纳税人的钱必须直接用于支付或保障必要的医疗服务。

把钱打进人们的 HSA —— 真的非常蠢。

This is dumb. Really dumb. Really Really Dumb.

Why? Because when you give it to Ins Carriers under the ACA, they have to spend at least 85pct of it on care for plan holders.

When sent to people's HSAs, there is no assurance that the money will be spent on healthcare costs at all.

A recipient can save the money and take it out when they turn 65.

MORE LIKELY , people will get that HSA cash, immediately take it out, pay the 20 pct penalty and buy whatever they want

So your tax dollars could be throwing parties !

Does this mean I like the subsidies going to the big insurance carriers ? No.

It means there are better ways to do this.

Whatever we do, taxpayer money HAS TO GO DIRECTLY TOWARDS PAYING or Guaranteeing NECESSARY MEDICAL CARE.

Sending money to people's HSAs is really dumb

Sharing

相关观点