每当你看到关于 Saylor 和 Strategy 的 FUD（恐慌、怀疑、否定）时，其实很有意思去看看那些低智商黑子到底在质疑什么。 在过去两年里，Strategy 一共买入了 496,740 枚比特币。 时间跨度：2023 年 12 月 27 日 → 2025 年 12 月 15 日 天数：约 719 天 这相当于：每天买入约 691 枚比特币，连续整整两年。 也就是说：每天买入约 5,940 万美元的比特币，连续整整两年。 仅 Saylor 一人，在将近两年的时间里，平均每天吸收的比特币数量约为全球日发行量的 1.5 倍。 这不是机会主义式的抄底，而是持续的、结构性的供给吸收。 有多少公司，能够在几乎没有额外管理成本、也不影响自身运营的情况下，每天悄无声息地买入 6,000 万美元的资产，并持续两年？ Saylor 的批评者还在争论“这套模式行不行”，而他已经用行动证明：它就是行得通。 黑子们在争论理论。 Saylor 在公布结果。 不要去做空顶级掠食者。 顺便一提……我之前算错了。 实际上，这两年里每天买入的金额是 7,230 万美元，连续整整两年。 **总收购成本：**约 520 亿美元 **时间跨度：**约 719 天 520 亿美元 ÷ 719 天 ≈ 每天 7,230 万美元 Whenever you see the Saylor and Strategy FUD, it's always fun to actually look at what the low IQ haters are doubting. Over the last two years, Strategy has purchased 496,740 Bitcoin. Time span: Dec 27, 2023 → Dec 15, 2025 Days: ~719 days That is 691 Bitcoin per day. For two straight years. $59.4 million dollars of Bitcoin. Every day. For two straight years. Saylor alone averaged ~1.5× daily global issuance of Bitcoin for nearly two straight years. That is sustained, structural supply absorption, not opportunistic buying. How many companies can quietly acquire $60 million of assets per day, for two straight years, with nearly zero overhead and no operational drag? Saylor’s critics are still debating whether this works while he’s already demonstrated that it does. The haters are arguing theory. Saylor is publishing results. Do not fade the apex predator. BTW.... I actually did the math wrong. It has actually been $72.3 million PER DAY for two straight years. Total acquisition cost: ≈ $52.0 billion Time span: ≈ 719 days $52,000,000,000 ÷ 719 ≈ $72.3 million per day
观点原文
每当你看到关于 Saylor 和 Strategy 的 FUD（恐慌、怀疑、否定）时，其实很有意思去看看那些低智商黑子到底在质疑什么。
在过去两年里，Strategy 一共买入了 496,740 枚比特币。
时间跨度：2023 年 12 月 27 日 → 2025 年 12 月 15 日
天数：约 719 天
这相当于：每天买入约 691 枚比特币，连续整整两年。
也就是说：每天买入约 5,940 万美元的比特币，连续整整两年。
仅 Saylor 一人，在将近两年的时间里，平均每天吸收的比特币数量约为全球日发行量的 1.5 倍。
这不是机会主义式的抄底，而是持续的、结构性的供给吸收。
有多少公司，能够在几乎没有额外管理成本、也不影响自身运营的情况下，每天悄无声息地买入 6,000 万美元的资产，并持续两年？
Saylor 的批评者还在争论“这套模式行不行”，而他已经用行动证明：它就是行得通。
黑子们在争论理论。
Saylor 在公布结果。
不要去做空顶级掠食者。
顺便一提……我之前算错了。
实际上，这两年里每天买入的金额是 7,230 万美元，连续整整两年。
总收购成本：约 520 亿美元
时间跨度：约 719 天
520 亿美元 ÷ 719 天 ≈ 每天 7,230 万美元
Whenever you see the Saylor and Strategy FUD, it's always fun to actually look at what the low IQ haters are doubting.
Over the last two years, Strategy has purchased 496,740 Bitcoin.
Time span: Dec 27, 2023 → Dec 15, 2025
Days: ~719 days
That is 691 Bitcoin per day. For two straight years.
$59.4 million dollars of Bitcoin. Every day. For two straight years.
Saylor alone averaged ~1.5× daily global issuance of Bitcoin for nearly two straight years.
That is sustained, structural supply absorption, not opportunistic buying.
How many companies can quietly acquire $60 million of assets per day, for two straight years, with nearly zero overhead and no operational drag?
Saylor’s critics are still debating whether this works while he’s already demonstrated that it does.
The haters are arguing theory.
Saylor is publishing results.
Do not fade the apex predator.
BTW.... I actually did the math wrong.
It has actually been $72.3 million PER DAY for two straight years.
Total acquisition cost: ≈ $52.0 billion
Time span: ≈ 719 days
$52,000,000,000 ÷ 719 ≈ $72.3 million per day
相关观点
- 2007 年，诺基亚占据了 50% 的手机市场。 2010 年，百视达拒绝了奈飞。 2015 年，出租车司机嘲笑 Uber。 2023 年，人们说 AI 永远不可能取代工作。 2026 年，人们又说塞勒不可能利用数字资本去重塑固定收益市场。 要么进化，要么成为案例。 In 2007, Nokia had 50% of the phone market. In 2010, Blockbuster rejected Netflix. In 2015, taxis laughed at Uber. In 2023, they said AI would never replace jobs. In 2026, they said Saylor wouldn't use digital capital to revolutionize the fixed income market. Adapt or become a case study.Adam Livingston · 2026/01/19
- Strategy 与罗斯柴尔德家族——第一个建立在比特币之上的帝国 历史不会简单重复，但货币架构会。 我在跨越 三个世纪的金融权力史 中，追踪到同一个模式： * 英格兰银行的主权债务机器 * Rothschild family 的黄金清算网络 * Strategy 的比特币金库飞轮 每一个时代，都遵循同一套底层逻辑： * 掌控最核心的抵押品 * 以低于其长期升值速度的成本进行融资 * 将规模转化为更强的资本获取能力 * 不断复利，直到竞争者在结构上被彻底挤出 18 世纪，英国通过“永久国债”这一金融武器，构建了全球帝国。 19 世纪，罗斯柴尔德家族控制了黄金结算体系，主导了整个欧洲的流动性。 今天，Strategy 正在公共资本市场中复制同样的架构——以比特币作为储备资产，以股票市场作为放大器。 🔥STRATEGY AND THE ROTHSCHILDS - THE FIRST EMPIRE BUILT ON BITCOIN🔥 History doesn’t repeat itself, but monetary architecture does! I trace a single pattern across three centuries of financial power: The Bank of England’s sovereign debt machine The Rothschild bullion network Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury flywheel Each era follows the same logic: Secure the dominant collateral. Finance it below its long-term appreciation rate. Recycle scale into greater access to capital. Compound until competitors are structurally boxed out. In the 18th century, Britain weaponized perpetual bonds and built a global empire. In the 19th century, the Rothschilds controlled gold settlement and dictated liquidity across Europe. Today, Strategy applies that same architecture inside public markets using Bitcoin as the reserve asset and equity markets as the amplifierAdam Livingston · 2026/01/11
- 2015 年告诉你比特币一文不值的那些理财顾问，如今大多在各家公司里任职于所谓的“区块链部门”，还会在 LinkedIn 上给你发关于“数字资产整合”的帖子。 这些人，正是当年一边用邮寄方式报税，一边说互联网只是昙花一现的人。 这场革命，不会被分散配置在一个 60/40 的投资组合里。 Every financial advisor who told you Bitcoin was worthless in 2015 now works at a company with a "blockchain division" and sends you LinkedIn posts about "digital asset integration." These are the same people who said the internet was a fad while filing their taxes by mail. The revolution will not be diversified across a 60/40 portfolio.Adam Livingston · 2026/01/05
- 很多普通人觉得比特币很危险。 与此同时，他们却把一生的积蓄存进一家依法可以把其中 90% 拿去放贷的银行，用来资助别人买第四套投资房；他们的信用评分由算法决定，而这些算法甚至会因为你太快还清债务而惩罚你；他们在工作中，雇主周四凌晨 2 点就能看到工资入账，却仍然让他们等到周五才能动用自己的钱，理由是“处理中”；他们每月花 840 美元买医保，却还有 7,000 美元的自付额，等于花钱只是为了继续自掏腰包付一切费用的资格；他们看着在 1987 年花 4.3 万美元买房的婴儿潮一代父母对自己说“多存点钱就好了”，而现在一套入门级住房的价格却是中位年薪的 47 倍；他们还把钱放在一个系统里，在这个系统中，12 个人坐在一个房间里就能凭空创造 4 万亿美元，并在 18 个月内抹掉你 30% 的购买力，理由是商业地产“具有系统性重要性”。 但当然啦，那个去中心化、持有即所有、拥有完美可审计轨迹、且完全无法被增发的资产，才是所谓的“投机赌博”。 而不是美元——它背靠的是一个负债 38 万亿美元的政府所承诺的“完全信用与担保”，这个政府刚刚还在巴尔的摩，在一座被船撞坏的桥上花了 1,500 亿美元。 退出这场彻底的疯狂吧。 Normies think Bitcoin is risky. Meanwhile they’re depositing their entire life savings into a bank that’s legally allowed to lend out 90% of it to fund someone’s fourth investment property, getting a credit score determined by algorithms that penalize you for PAYING OFF debt too fast, working jobs where their employer can see their direct deposit hit at 2am Thursday but still makes them wait until Friday to access their own money “for processing,” spending $840/month on health insurance that has a $7,000 deductible so they’re essentially paying for the privilege of still paying for everything, watching their boomer parents who bought a house for $43,000 in 1987 tell them to “just save more” while a starter home costs 47x the median salary, and literally keeping their money in a system where 12 guys in a room can decide to create $4 trillion out of thin air and delete 30% of your purchasing power in 18 months because the commercial real estate market is “systemically important.” But sure, the decentralized bearer asset with a perfect audit trail and absolutely zero way to inflate the supply is the speculative gamble. Not the dollar, which is backed by the “full faith and credit” of a government that’s $38 trillion in debt and just spent $150 billion on a bridge in Baltimore that a boat crashed into. Opt out of this absolute madness.Adam Livingston · 2025/12/30