我的解决方案——虽然并不完美——是这样的: 与其像全民医保(M4A)那样,让政府或纳税人承担几乎所有医疗支出的付款义务,不如由政府承担‘未付款风险’——也就是说,对相同的医疗服务,按 Medicare 或 Medicare 参考定价(Reference Pricing)计算,政府保证所有患者的债务,并根据收入状况(means-tested)设定还款计划。 不再存在除补充保险(supplemental plans)之外的其他医疗保险。在这种模式下,纳税人扮演保险公司的角色:他们不再支付固定保费,而是根据自己的负担能力,为自己实际使用的医疗服务付费。 My solution, and it’s not perfect, is: Rather than the government/taxpayers taking on the obligation of payment for almost all medical care as M4A proposes, we take on the risk of non-payment at Medicare or Medicare Reference Pricing, for the same care, by guaranteeing all patient debt and seeking means tested repayment plans. No HC insurance beyond supplemental plans. The taxpayer acts as the insurance company. Rather than premiums, taxpayers pay for what they use, based on what they can afford.

Mark CubanEntrepreneur & Investor

观点原文

我的解决方案——虽然并不完美——是这样的:

与其像全民医保(M4A)那样,让政府或纳税人承担几乎所有医疗支出的付款义务,不如由政府承担‘未付款风险’——也就是说,对相同的医疗服务,按 Medicare 或 Medicare 参考定价(Reference Pricing)计算,政府保证所有患者的债务,并根据收入状况(means-tested)设定还款计划。

不再存在除补充保险(supplemental plans)之外的其他医疗保险。在这种模式下,纳税人扮演保险公司的角色:他们不再支付固定保费,而是根据自己的负担能力,为自己实际使用的医疗服务付费。

My solution, and it’s not perfect, is:

Rather than the government/taxpayers taking on the obligation of payment for almost all medical care as M4A proposes, we take on the risk of non-payment at Medicare or Medicare Reference Pricing, for the same care, by guaranteeing all patient debt and seeking means tested repayment plans.

No HC insurance beyond supplemental plans. The taxpayer acts as the insurance company. Rather than premiums, taxpayers pay for what they use, based on what they can afford.

Founder

相关观点