Trump Issues Statement on U.S. Destroyers Passing Through the Strait of Hormuz
President Trump stated that three U.S. Navy destroyers successfully passed through the Strait of Hormuz under enemy fire, with no damage to the ships, while the Iranian attackers suffered severe losses, with multiple small vessels sunk.
The statement noted that missiles fired by Iran were easily intercepted, and drones were destroyed in the air, emphasizing that Iran is led by "madmen" who would not hesitate to use nuclear weapons if given the chance.
Trump warned that if Iran does not quickly sign an agreement, the U.S. will defeat them with greater force and violence, and stated that the three destroyers will return to the "Steel Wall" naval blockade.
Source: Public Information
ABAB AI Insight
Trump has previously responded to Middle Eastern attacks with similar tough rhetoric during his term, including the precision strike on Soleimani in 2020 and the escort operations in 2025. This statement continues his "maximum pressure" strategy, directly translating military success into negotiation leverage.
On the capital path, the U.S. guides energy market expectations through public signals of military victory, shifting resources from direct conflict to maintaining blockades and deterrence, with more funds flowing into naval deployments, arms sales to allies, and oil price hedging tools. The motivation is to prevent prolonged turmoil in the Strait of Hormuz from driving up global energy prices while accelerating Iranian concessions in nuclear negotiations.
Similar to Trump's tough statements during the 2019 tanker crisis and Israel's public responses to Iranian targets, the U.S.-Iran game is transitioning from ceasefire testing to high-pressure negotiation control.
Essentially, this represents a regulatory change: achieving a temporary transfer of pricing power from Iran to U.S. strategic deterrence through public military victories and nuclear threat narratives. The mechanism involves converting limited Strait conflicts into global energy pricing leverage, forcing opponents to quickly compromise on nuclear and missile issues while stabilizing market confidence in U.S. energy security commitments.
ABAB News · Cognitive Law
Military victory is never the end, but instantly doubles the chips on the negotiation table.
Blockade is not war, but slowly wears down the opponent's time and money into one's own advantage.
The more poetic the tough statement, the more realistic the market pricing of true power.