Blake Scholl founded Boom Supersonic in 2014 with the goal of restarting supersonic commercial passenger flights that have been interrupted since the Concorde was retired; the company's scale model technology demonstrator XB-1 is set to complete its test flight and break the sound barrier in early 2025, becoming the first civil aircraft to achieve supersonic flight since the Concorde's retirement. Scholl has consistently presented himself as someone who "dares to challenge the industry consensus viewed as outdated or overly cautious" during this process.

Boom Supersonic has previously secured letters of intent for its supersonic aircraft Overture from airlines such as American Airlines and United Airlines, and has received funding and collaborative support from venture capital and the U.S. Air Force. Scholl's public advocacy for "accelerating AI" resonates with the company's actual need for heavy reliance on AI-assisted computing in high-investment R&D areas such as aerodynamic design and material simulation—the iteration speed of AI technology directly relates to whether the development cycle of its supersonic aircraft can be shortened and engineering costs can be reduced.

This path of "technological optimism + personally disrupting traditional industries" is similar to Elon Musk's strategy of redefining space launch costs through SpaceX and redefining the electric vehicle industry through Tesla—both choose to re-invest in areas considered "proven to be unprofitable or too dangerous" and publicly advocate for related cutting-edge technologies to be pushed more aggressively rather than being cautiously restricted. The current tech industry is in a phase of open confrontation between the "AI acceleration faction" and the "AI cautious faction," competing for public opinion and policy discourse power.

Essentially, this is a station team under the logic of technological substitution: positioning AI as a general technology comparable to the steam engine means that whoever can apply AI to their core R&D and production processes faster and more fully is more likely to gain an efficiency advantage in the next round of industrial competition. The mechanism at play is that general technology revolutions have historically been accompanied by the rule that "early adopters gain nonlinear efficiency dividends," so a group of tech entrepreneurs, including Scholl, instinctively stand on the side of the "acceleration camp"—slowing down AI development equates to giving up the first-mover efficiency advantage they are accumulating.

ABAB News · Law of Cognition

In a general technology revolution, those who hesitate fall behind first
Whoever uses AI to build planes speaks for AI
Acceleration is not a position, but the self-interest of the first mover