Back to news

South Korea Leads East Asia in Crypto with $449.1 Billion

Chainalysis released a report on East Asia's crypto adoption on October 5. From July 2025 to June 2026, crypto activity in East Asia slightly contracted amid a global bear market, totaling approximately $1.2 trillion, but the internal dynamics have changed: South Korea remains the largest retail trading hub, Hong Kong handles institutional settlements, Japanese users are shifting to decentralized exchanges, and the use of stablecoins in mainland China continues to expand.

South Korea's crypto economy reached $449.1 billion during the same period, a 12.3% increase from the previous cycle, ranking first in East Asia and fifth in the agency's grassroots adoption index. Japan, Hong Kong, mainland China, and Taiwan followed with $228.3 billion, $192.2 billion, $176.3 billion, and $140.4 billion, respectively. The growth in South Korea primarily came from capital flows on trading platforms, with local platform ecosystems adding approximately $51.1 billion in new traffic, and domestic ecosystem-related activities growing by 16.3%.

Structural changes in South Korea are concentrated in AI tokens. By June 2026, AI-related crypto assets had become the largest thematic sector in KRW trading, surpassing payment tokens like XRP in popularity. During the observation period, Worldcoin's trading volume was $7.41 billion, with SAHARA, VIRTUAL, BIO, and NEAR at $3.2 billion, $2.7 billion, $2 billion, and $1.7 billion, respectively. The trading of AI tokens priced in KRW accounted for approximately 19.5 times that of the JPY market.

In Hong Kong's $192.2 billion market, institutional platform inflows grew by 87% year-on-year, accounting for 16% of service inflows, nearly three times that of other markets in the region. Net inflows from business-to-business transactions were recorded at $24 billion in the agency's blog. Non-business channels continued to see net outflows. In Japan's $228.3 billion market, decentralized exchanges accounted for 34.5% of service activities, the highest among markets with established centralized exchanges, with participation related to decentralized exchanges growing over 200% compared to 2022, and retail activities on decentralized exchanges expanding by 36%.

Changes in mainland China are occurring at the wallet level rather than through licensed exchanges. The number of stablecoin peer-to-peer wallets increased 43-fold, with the scale of senders also expanding, focusing on stablecoin transfers between personal wallets rather than trading thematic coins on public markets. South Korean institutions remain in the preparatory stage: banks and brokerages have generally formed digital asset teams to promote stablecoin, custody, and tokenization pilots, but direct market entry by enterprises has not yet scaled. The report states that if the crypto asset income tax is implemented as scheduled in 2027 and trading restrictions for enterprises continue to ease, the current retail-dominated landscape may be reassessed.

These are four funding paths within the same bear market, not a single risk appetite rebound. South Korea sees retail investors using KRW to buy AI-themed assets, Hong Kong sees enterprises integrating settlements and custody into licensed channels, Japan sees retail moving from centralized platforms to decentralized exchanges and perpetual contracts, while mainland China sees stablecoins expanding between peer-to-peer wallets. Beneficiaries include South Korean thematic coin market makers, Hong Kong institutional custodians, and Japanese decentralized exchanges; those under pressure include South Korean platforms relying solely on traffic from old payment coins like XRP and local institutions still excluded from enterprise accounts.

Source: Public Information

ABAB AI Insight

South Korean retail investors are transferring thematic trading from stocks into crypto, a trend that did not just emerge in 2026. From 2021 to 2024, the KRW trading volumes on Upbit and Bithumb were repeatedly dominated by high-turnover coins like XM, ADA, and XRP, with premiums at times exceeding offshore dollar prices. Chainalysis' shift in focus from payment coins to Worldcoin, SAHARA, and VIRTUAL indicates a change in narrative rather than account structure. Hong Kong is following the path of licensing virtual asset service providers in 2022 and allowing retail trading in 2023, channeling growth into business-to-business inflows rather than retail transactions.

The allocation of funds has thus diverged. Approximately $51.1 billion in new platform traffic in South Korea remains on centralized order books, while banks and brokerages continue to work on stablecoin, custody, and tokenization pilots, with enterprise self-trading blocked by trading restrictions, preventing institutional capital from entering the market. Hong Kong's $24 billion enterprise inflow and 87% growth in institutional platforms focus on settlement and custody. Japanese retail activities are shifting towards decentralized exchanges, with their share reaching 34.5%, as margin and perpetual contract fees move away from licensed exchanges. The 43-fold growth in stablecoin peer-to-peer wallets in mainland China bypasses public exchanges, transforming into cross-border payments and value storage.

The comparison is not to the 2017 East Asian crypto boom, but rather to South Korean retail investors moving thematic stock trading systems onto crypto order books after 2015, while Singapore established institutional custody as a regional hub. South Korea is still expanding trading volumes, Hong Kong is controlling settlement nodes, Japan is transitioning from centralized platforms, and mainland China is expanding at the wallet level, which is not visible to regulators. The four regions are at four different stages and cannot be synthesized into a single "East Asian bull market."

Structurally, this represents a reconstruction of the industry chain. Pricing power is no longer solely in global USD trading pairs but is divided into KRW thematic coins, HKD and USD institutional settlements, JPY decentralized contracts, and stablecoin peer-to-peer transactions surrounding RMB. The bear market separates speculative flows from functional flows: when total scale contracts, those who control local currency entry points, custody licenses, or wallet networks will retain transaction fees and settlement income.

ABAB News · Cognitive Laws

  1. The bear market does not eliminate trading; it merely divides flows into different channels.
  2. Retail buys narratives, institutions buy settlements, and regulators buy entry points.
  3. Growth in the same region often involves four types of businesses.

Source

·ABAB News
·
8 min read
·2d ago
分享: