According to screenshots circulating on social platform X, the official X account of digital asset trading platform Websea once posted an accusatory tweet
Websea official X account: previously posted wage complaint before deleting it
According to screenshots circulating on social platform X, the official X account of digital asset trading platform Websea once posted an accusatory tweet, publicly accusing the company’s boss and CEO of withholding employees’ wages and reimbursement payments, and the tweet was later deleted.
The screenshots show that the poster said employees had devoted time and effort to the company but had not received basic wages or work reimbursements, and said the company had apparently already stopped normal operations, while management had long failed to provide a clear payment arrangement. The poster asked Websea’s boss and CEO to respond directly to the wage and reimbursement issues, announce a clear and credible payment timetable, and settle all amounts owed to employees as soon as possible, while also calling on the Web3 industry to pay attention to the matter.
At present, the tweet can no longer be viewed directly on the account, and the relevant content exists only in the form of circulating screenshots. English reports from TokenPost, Phemex News and others all cited these screenshots in describing the above accusations.
Original source:
Title: Websea’s Official X Account Accuses Management of Unpaid Wages and Work Reimbursements
Publisher: TokenPost
Publication date: 2026-11-12
URL: tokenpost.com/news/business/55039
Source nature: crypto media report (based on circulating screenshots)
Verification status: The report was read and confirmed to describe accusations that the official X account had posted and then deleted; the original tweet has been deleted, and the content relies on screenshots and secondary reporting
Supporting content: TokenPost said Websea’s official X account accused management of withholding employees’ wages and reimbursements, and said the company may have already stopped normal operations; it asked the boss and CEO to respond, announce a payment timetable, and settle the amounts owed; the post was then deleted; there had previously been reports of user withdrawal problems
ABAB AI Insight
Historically, when crypto trading platforms are under financial or operational pressure, it is not uncommon for official channels to briefly post employee or internal complaint posts and then delete them. Once such a post appears and is quickly removed, the market typically interprets it as a sign that internal conflicts have become public.
From a capital-flow perspective, wage allegations directly point to problems with the company’s cash flow or priority arrangements. If employee pay and reimbursements cannot be made on time, this is often accompanied by delayed user withdrawals or maintenance announcements, creating a dual pressure on the platform’s operational continuity.
Compared with peers, other small or regional trading platforms have also had cases where abnormal posts were made on official accounts and then deleted during similar stages. Unlike platforms that have completed restructuring or have a clear payment timetable, Websea this time has only left circulating screenshots, with no official company response yet.
Structurally, the screenshots and their deletion themselves constitute an information event, but they do not equal verified facts of unpaid wages. Whether employees will speak out further, whether the company will announce a payment arrangement, or whether user withdrawal problems will widen will determine whether the incident shifts from an internal accusation to a confirmable operational disruption.
ABAB News · Cognitive Law
An official account’s post being deleted only proves that the content was briefly public; it does not automatically mean management has confirmed the unpaid wage allegation.
When circulating screenshots are spread through secondary reports, the scope of fact-checking is limited to “such an accusation did appear,” not “the accusation has been verified.”
When warning signs appear for both employee compensation and user withdrawals, platform operational continuity must be judged through subsequent official arrangements rather than a single post.