Back to Flash News

Peter H. Diamandis Says We Should Use AI Faster Instead of Fearing It

Peter H. Diamandis pointed out that historically, the core issue has never been whether a technology is dangerous. Both fire and nuclear energy are hazardous, yet humanity has used them in revolutionary ways. Therefore, we should learn to use AI faster than we fear it.

He cited fire and nuclear energy as examples of dangerous technologies that have ultimately been widely adopted by society and have driven progress, emphasizing that AI falls into this category as well. The core issue is not to avoid danger but to accelerate mastery and application.

Diamandis has long promoted the accelerated application of technology through XPRIZE and Abundance360. Recently, he discussed the trade-offs of AI risks and benefits multiple times on the Moonshots podcast, referencing Sam Altman's view on accepting some negative impacts in exchange for broader accessibility.

In public discussions, he noted that those most afraid of AI often focus on potential future harms, while those lacking AI are experiencing definite current dilemmas, including insufficient medical diagnoses and missed educational opportunities. Thus, the cost of delaying use is higher than the potential risks.

Diamandis also stated that AI might make people timid rather than lazy; those who wait for clarity before acting will fall behind. The winners of this decade will be those who start building today, not those who wait for the perfect moment.

In market mechanisms, businesses and individuals willing to accelerate AI deployment are gaining first-mover efficiency advantages, while cautious institutions and regulatory frameworks face pressure from faster iterators. Capital and talent are flowing towards those who can embed AI into practical processes.

In public discussions, he repeatedly emphasized that the danger of technology is not a determining factor; the key is whether the speed of use matches the speed of institutional adaptation. He pointed out that human institutions need to evolve to keep pace with technology, or they will miss the window of opportunity.

Source: Public Information

ABAB AI Insight

Peter H. Diamandis, as the founder of XPRIZE and curator of Abundance360, has long promoted the transition of technology from the lab to large-scale application through incentive prizes and public dissemination. Previously, he has taken the path of 'accelerating use before perfecting rules' in genomics, space, and health, and his recent statements on AI continue his historical stance of viewing dangerous technologies as tools that can be tamed.

In terms of capital pathways, he directs resources towards teams and institutions willing to rapidly deploy AI through podcasts, conferences, and awards, while publicly challenging overly cautious regulatory narratives. His motivation is to shorten the cycle from technology emergence to actual benefits, allowing capital to gain compound returns in the early adoption phase rather than waiting for risks to be completely eliminated.

This is analogous to the transition of nuclear energy from military applications to civilian power generation in the 20th century, where early controversies focused on danger, ultimately achieving large-scale use through engineering controls. Currently, AI is transitioning from laboratory models to everyday tools, and Diamandis's stance resembles that of early supporters of internet openness rather than strict licensing.

Structurally, this intersects regulatory changes and technological substitution, where danger itself does not determine the fate of technology. The determining factor is the gap between the speed of use and the speed of institutional adaptation. The mechanism is that delaying use cedes potential benefits to faster actors while allowing risks to accumulate without practical experience, rather than being exposed and iterated through actual application.

ABAB News · Cognitive Laws

  1. The danger of technology has never been the real issue.
  2. Using faster than fearing is how to tame dangerous technologies.
  3. Waiting for risks to disappear means ceding benefits to others.