Trump Claims Progress on Hyperliquid's Compliance for U.S. Entry
Trump stated that U.S. regulators are pushing the decentralized perpetual contract trading platform Hyperliquid to enter the U.S. market in a "fully compliant and legal" manner; specific regulatory pathways, licensing entities, or timelines have not yet been disclosed in public English information.
Hyperliquid is a decentralized trading platform operating on its own blockchain, with its core product being perpetual contracts, allowing users to trade leveraged contracts on crypto assets using collateral on-chain; the key to its U.S. entry is not the rules for spot token issuance, but rather derivatives trading, customer identity verification, market monitoring, clearing risks, and investor protection requirements.
U.S. regulation of crypto perpetual contracts typically involves the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), depending on the specific underlying assets and contract structures; offering leveraged derivatives to U.S. retail customers may require compliance with commodity exchange, futures commission merchant, swap execution facility, or other registration framework requirements.
The SEC recently proposed "Regulation Crypto Assets," which sets a $5 million four-year exemption and a $75 million annual exemption for certain token financing and investment contracts, but this rule primarily addresses token issuance and securities characteristics and does not directly authorize perpetual contracts to be opened to U.S. customers.
The HYPE token of Hyperliquid rose to over $59 around the time of the news, increasing about 7.5% over the past week; this price movement reflects market expectations for potential regulatory entry and should not be interpreted as approval for U.S. operations or that the platform has obtained the necessary licenses.
In market mechanisms, potential buyers are U.S. institutions and qualified retail participants wishing to trade crypto derivatives on-chain, while potential sellers are market makers providing liquidity, hedging, and leveraged exposure; the event is driven by expectations of U.S. compliance entry. If the regulatory pathway is clarified, trading volume, collateral demand, and liquidity provision needs may flow to Hyperliquid; centralized exchanges' perpetual contract businesses and existing U.S. compliant derivatives platforms may face competition, but until formal documents, registration status, and operational restrictions are disclosed, related expectations remain policy-driven.
Source: Public Information
ABAB AI Insight
U.S. regulators have historically treated crypto derivatives differently from spot: CME has long provided Bitcoin and Ethereum futures under CFTC oversight, while Binance reached a $4.3 billion settlement with the CFTC in 2023, with core issues including allegations of offering unregistered derivatives trading to U.S. customers. If Hyperliquid seeks to enter the U.S., it must address not whether the chain is decentralized, but who operates key functions, who interacts with customers, and who bears the responsibilities for clearing and market oversight.
Capital pathways will shift from on-chain liquidity to licensing, compliance, and institutional distribution. Compliance typically requires KYC, sanctions screening, geographic restrictions, trade monitoring, customer asset protection, risk reserve disclosures, and regulated entities to assume customer relationships; this will increase entry costs but may attract institutional funds that previously could not participate in unlicensed perpetual markets. Liquidity providers will also reassess whether U.S. order flow is worth the higher compliance and capital requirements.
Historically, Coinbase entered the U.S. regulated derivatives market by acquiring FairX and renaming it Coinbase Derivatives Exchange; Kraken gained access to U.S. futures business through the acquisition of Small Exchange. Both share the commonality of conducting derivatives business through regulated entities and clearing structures, rather than directly opening existing offshore or unlicensed products to the U.S.; Hyperliquid is currently in a transitional phase from an on-chain native trading venue to a regulated entry point.
Essentially, regulatory changes reshape the allocation rules of trading markets. The U.S. capital pool is large, but the suitability of clients for leveraged products and systemic risk requirements are high; when regulation allows compliant versions to enter, value will shift from mere unlicensed matching to operators that can combine decentralized liquidity, regulated customer access, and auditable risk control. Those who can fit on-chain efficiency into the U.S. regulatory container may gain new order flow and pricing power.
ABAB News · Cognitive Law
Decentralization solves efficiency, compliance determines capital limits
Exchanges compete for liquidity, regulators compete for responsible entities
To enter the largest market, first accept the strictest rules