Back to Flash News

Oracle's stock price has dropped about 67% since its September peak, corresponding to a market value evaporation of about $660 billion

Oracle's stock price has dropped about 67% since its September peak, corresponding to a market value evaporation of about $660 billion.

The main reason for the decline is the market's ongoing skepticism about whether its AI capital expenditures can translate into sufficiently fast profit returns, alongside rising pressures from company debt and data center investments.

In market mechanisms, buyers have shifted from "AI narrative premium" to "cash flow validation," while sellers face high valuation expectations and heavy capital expansion; once financing and return cycles mismatch, the first to be pressured are valuation anchors and leverage costs.

Source: Public information

ABAB AI Insight

The core of Oracle's recent pullback is not seasonal performance fluctuations, but rather the market beginning to reprice its AI infrastructure expansion model. Reports indicate that investor concerns over its massive data center spending, thin profit margins, and debt levels have overshadowed the AI partnership narrative itself.

In terms of capital pathways, Oracle plays the role of "selling shovels" in the AI chain, but selling shovels does not guarantee profits. It must first invest heavily in building data centers and then recover cash through cloud leasing; when the market realizes that the cash recovery speed does not match the investment intensity, the valuation will shift from growth stock logic to capital-intensive hardware logic.

Historically, similar revaluations often occur during high investment phases in infrastructure: first elevated by narratives, then brought back to reality by cash flow and leverage constraints. Oracle's current pullback has also directly exposed the vulnerabilities of the "computing power supply side" in the AI industry chain—orders and contracts can support expectations, but what truly determines valuation is the return curve.

Essentially, this is a transfer of pricing power: when the market no longer pays for future narratives but demands current profits and capital efficiency, pricing power shifts from management and narrative to funding costs and cash flow.

ABAB News · Cognitive Law

  1. Narratives can elevate valuations, but cash flow can defend valuations.

  2. The heavier the capital expenditure, the lower the margin for error.

  3. The first thing validated in the AI era is the rate of return.