ABAB News Logo
Back to Flash News

Paxos freezes 1,906.67 PAXG related to the Binance incident

On October 29, 2026, Paxos’s official account posted that earlier public reports indicated Binance had been affected by a security incident. On-chain analysis showed that PAXG tokens held on the Binance platform were transferred to an address suspected to belong to the attacker. After conducting its own blockchain investigation, Paxos froze 1,906.67 PAXG in wallet 0x5227f603C1eE34CE3C06eFe6477003BDfCCB2f8c.

Paxos said its systems were not affected by this incident. The reserves for PAXG, PYUSD and USDG remain intact, and redemptions continue to operate normally. The company said it will work closely with law enforcement and regulators and provide further updates as appropriate.

The address is related to a suspected abnormal outflow from Binance’s hot wallet on the same day. Binance officially confirmed that it is conducting a security review, that withdrawals will resume after the security issue is fully resolved, and that user funds are safe. Tether and Circle had previously frozen the related stablecoins.

Original sources:

  1. Title: Earlier today, public reports indicated that Binance was impacted by a security incident... Publisher: Paxos (@Paxos) Publication date: 2026-10-29 URL: https://x.com/Paxos/status/2115940744590753813 Source type: official announcement Verification status: the full post was read for this article, verification date 2026-10-29 Supporting content: Paxos confirmed it had frozen 1,906.67 PAXG in the specified wallet, that its systems were unaffected, and that reserves remained intact and redemptions normal

  2. Title: Our team is conducting security checks. Withdrawals will resume as soon as the security issue is fully resolved. Publisher: Binance (@binance) Publication date: 2026-10-29 URL: https://x.com/binance/status/2115935002139742437 Source type: official announcement Verification status: the official post was read for this article, verification date 2026-10-29 Supporting content: Binance confirmed it is conducting security checks (background)

  3. Title: Our teams are aware of reports of a potential security issue... Publisher: Binance (@binance) Publication date: 2026-10-29 URL: https://x.com/binance/status/2115918888429133902 Source type: official announcement Verification status: the official post was read for this article, verification date 2026-10-29 Supporting content: Binance confirmed it is investigating a potential security issue (background)

ABAB AI Insight

Paxos’s freeze targeted PAXG that had been held on the Binance platform and then transferred to an address suspected to belong to the attacker. Unlike Tether and Circle, which froze USDC/USDT through blacklisting, PAXG is a gold-backed token, and its issuer likewise has the ability to freeze addresses. The frozen amount was 1,906.67 tokens, a targeted action on a specific asset rather than a suspension of the entire protocol.

In terms of the capital flow, after the attacker moved assets out of the exchange’s hot wallet, freezable tokens (stablecoins, gold-backed tokens, etc.) could be locked through the issuer’s blacklist, reducing the efficiency of subsequent cash-out or re-collateralization. Paxos explicitly stated that its own systems were unaffected, reserves were intact, and redemptions were normal, limiting the risk to the specific tokens that had already been moved.

Unlike lending protocols that block new deposits and borrows through a market freeze, a token issuer’s freeze directly affects on-chain ownership. This measure depends on the issuer’s on-chain confirmation of the relevant address. The observation indicators are whether Paxos announces a further freeze scope, or changes in the subsequent status of PAXG in the relevant address.

ABAB News · Cognitive Law

  1. A gold-backed token issuer can freeze a specific amount of PAXG in an address suspected to belong to the attacker without affecting its own reserves or redemptions.

  2. After a freezable asset is abnormally transferred out of an exchange hot wallet, the issuer’s blacklist becomes one of the paths to block further transfers.