Back to Flash News

St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem: Interest Rates Should Rise Further in the Next 6 to 9 Months

Alberto Musalem, President of the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank, told Bloomberg's Michael McKee at the New York Fixed Income Future Conference that monetary policy needs to tighten further to bring inflation back to the 2% target in a timely manner; if "timely" refers to about 18 months, interest rates should rise further in the next 6 to 9 months.

His exact words were that the current priority is to bring inflation towards 2% in a timely manner and to curb the further spread of inflationary pressures, as well as the second-round effects from negative supply shocks or persistent demand pressures. He stated that inflation remains high, driven by ongoing demand pressures and recurring negative supply shocks, which are pushing up energy prices. He typically sets policy paths based on an 18-month to 2-year timeline.

This year, Musalem is not a voting member of the Federal Open Market Committee. He did not predict the outcome of the meeting on October 27-28, stating that he remains open-minded at each meeting, but the overall direction of inflation requires consideration of further tightening. Traders generally expect the policy rate to remain at 3.75% to 4.00% in October. The Committee raised rates at the September 15-16 meeting and included another rate hike in the same meeting; the market currently anticipates the next rate hike in December. Minutes released on Wednesday show that further increases after last month's hike are already a set direction for many officials, with most expecting another hike at some point in 2026.

He defined inflation as the primary issue for the economy while also noting strong growth and a stable job market. His assessment is that the Fed is likely to lower inflation without harming hiring, and returning to 2% would be beneficial overall. His remarks also touched on the unsustainable fiscal path but did not provide new deficit figures or spending cut proposals.

This is a signal for the path, not a vote for the current meeting. He back-calculated the 18-month inflation target into a 6 to 9-month rate hike window, effectively setting December, rather than October, as a closer observation point. The supply shocks and demand pressures are treated equally, indicating that energy prices cannot be explained solely by demand-side factors.

This is an event-driven repricing of interest rates. Buyers are funds shortening duration, holding short-end and floating rates; sellers are betting on long-duration bonds and interest-sensitive growth stocks that expect a halt to rate hikes this year. Beneficiaries include banks whose net interest margins rise with policy rate increases, and upstream prices under energy supply constraints; pressured sectors include mortgages, commercial real estate, and companies relying on long-duration valuations.

Source: Public Information

ABAB AI Insight

Alberto Musalem's position comes from the regional Fed, not from the Board of Governors. He will succeed James Bullard as President of the St. Louis Fed in 2024; Bullard was one of the earliest regional presidents to publicly call for rapid rate hikes during the 2021-2023 rate hike cycle. Musalem does not have a vote this year, and his comments serve to provide a path for the December meeting and dot plot rather than to determine the 25 basis points on October 27.

Money movement occurs along the curve rather than through allocations. A rate hike has already occurred on September 15-16, with the dot plot indicating another hike this year, and traders still price October as a hold and December as the next hike. He defines "timely" as about 18 months, back-calculating to indicate that rates should continue to rise in the next 6 to 9 months, effectively telling short-end funds that a pause is not the end. Energy prices are categorized under recurring negative supply shocks, and the fiscal path is described as unsustainable, both indicating that inflation is not solely due to overheating demand, but the only tool remains interest rates.

Comparable examples include Alan Greenspan's continuous rate hikes in 1994 to combat inflation, and Jerome Powell's use of the federal funds rate as the main tool in 2022 amid concurrent supply shocks and demand. The difference is that the previous hikes started from near zero, while this discussion is occurring above 3.75% to 4.00%. The industry position is in a control period: hiring is described as stable, and the policy goal has shifted back from preserving jobs to returning to 2% on schedule.

The essence is a transfer of pricing power. The timeline for inflation to return to target determines who bears the financing costs for energy, fiscal, and wage pressures. Regional presidents without voting rights can still rewrite the 6 to 9-month path expectations; the votes are with the committee, and the term premium is in the hands of those writing this into the curve.

ABAB News · Law of Cognition

  1. Those without voting rights can also rewrite the six-month rate path.

  2. Rate hikes suppress demand, but supply shocks still affect prices.

  3. The target is 2%, but the timeline is the price.