Michael Burry, the prototype of 'The Big Short', applies for an injunction in California court to stop construction of 25 homes on Saratoga hillside
Michael Burry, in his capacity as president of a residents' group, has applied for an injunction in a California court to stop the construction of 25 homes on the Saratoga hillside. The project is located uphill from his residence and includes 5 units of lower-income housing.
The plaintiffs are Citizens for Responsible and Equitable Development, who filed a lawsuit on September 17 in the Santa Clara County Superior Court against the city council's approval of Masson Estates. The planning commission rejected the case on July 8, but after the developer appealed, the city council approved it in August and certified the environmental impact report. The group claims both votes were unanimous. The lawsuit alleges that the report did not adequately analyze the potential scenarios triggered by the project and states that some council members indicated in the records that the approval was motivated by fears of legal retaliation from the state Department of Housing and Community Development.
The project is located at 14791 Pierce Road, near Mountain Winery, on a parcel of approximately 72.45 acres, with homes and roads concentrated on about 18 acres on the north side. There are also claims that it is built on 25 acres of the 72-acre parcel. The plan includes 20 market-rate units and 5 affordable units. The city government estimates an increase of about 70 residents based on an average of 2.79 people per household, all of whom would need to evacuate via Pierce Road during wildfires. This road is classified by the state as a very high fire hazard severity zone.
Burry attributed the approval to the builder’s remedy in a public article on September 23: when local housing elements are non-compliant, as long as at least 20% of the units are designated as affordable, developers can bypass local zoning. The 5 affordable units represent exactly 20% of the 25 units. He noted that state law defines lower-income as 80% of the area median income; the median household income for the San Jose, Sunnyvale, and Santa Clara metro area is $205,500, making this affordable tier limited in local significance.
This is not a short sale of housing mortgages. The buyer aims to build homes on the approved site and use the 5 affordable units to access the state law pathway; the seller seeks to have the court revoke the approval to preserve the evacuation capacity for uphill residents on Pierce Road. The event is driven by the injunction application, with no funds changing hands. The beneficiaries would be the existing residents who would not see an additional 70 evacuees if the injunction is granted; the pressure is on the 25-unit project that has already gone through appeals and relies on the builder’s remedy, as well as the state housing department that pushes local approvals under compliance pressure. The 5 affordable units are also included in the same injunction.
Source: Public Information
ABAB AI Insight
Michael Burry shorted subprime mortgages through Scion Capital in the 2000s, an experience that was adapted into 'The Big Short'. He was addressing pricing errors in the housing credit chain, not land use litigation. This time, he serves as president of Citizens for Responsible and Equitable Development and filed a lawsuit on September 17 against the Saratoga City Council's approval from August, with the project located uphill from his residence. His role has shifted from trading housing risk to using litigation to delay housing supply.
The capital pathway does not go through funds. Masson Estates exchanges 5 affordable units for 20 market-rate units, utilizing the builder’s remedy to bypass local zoning; the planning commission rejected it on July 8, but after the developer's appeal, the city council approved it. The group seeks an injunction, claiming procedural defects in the evacuation capacity of Pierce Road and the environmental impact report, and states that council members are concerned about retaliation from the state housing department. Burry himself noted that the median household income for the metro area is $205,500, making the 80% affordable tier limited in local significance.
This can be compared to lawsuits against the builder’s remedy in other California cities, as well as residents' groups in Malibu and Athens Hills challenging hillside projects using evacuation routes. The industry position is not about the credit cycle, but rather judicial interception after state housing quotas override local zoning. The 5 affordable units and 20 market-rate units in the 25-unit project are bound together in the same injunction.
Structurally, this represents local veto power after regulatory changes. The mechanism is that state law exchanges non-compliance penalties for developers' breakthrough rights, with the city council approving during appeals, and residents' groups using California environmental reviews and fire evacuations to drag the approval back to court. Shorting subprime mortgages profits from price crashes, while stopping the uphill 25 units changes the timing of supply entering the market.
ABAB News · Cognitive Laws
Those who short housing prices may also sue their neighbors' new homes.
Once affordable quotas are reached, local zoning gives way.
The capacity of evacuation routes can become grounds for an injunction.