Community Accuses HTX of Ongoing Address Poisoning, Kraken Institutional Account Receives Alerts
Community users claim that parties related to Justin Sun are still engaging in address poisoning, stating that the other party claims to have investigated but has not released results related to the poisoning. Meanwhile, Kraken's institutional accounts have also received relevant alerts.
Previous on-chain records show that multiple small USDT transfers have occurred from HTX-related hot wallets, with some receiving addresses linked to Kraken deposit addresses, resulting in some users' funds being compliantly frozen, with reported amounts reaching up to approximately $4.2 million.
HTX and Justin Sun deny that there is an official initiation of poisoning, stating that internal investigations found no evidence of official accounts leading this, and claim that some reports are inaccurate or due to user actions.
This incident occurs against the backdrop of the UK and EU imposing sanctions on HTX and mainstream exchanges cutting off deposits and withdrawals, where even small transfers can trigger risk control.
The sanctions and isolation exacerbate address association risks, with funds flowing from marked sources to compliance checks, benefiting exchanges that strictly enforce sanction screenings, while HTX-related funds and receiving users bear the pressure. The incident drives the industry to pay further attention to dust transactions and automatic freezing mechanisms.
Source: Public Information
ABAB AI Insight
After facing sanctions from the UK and EU, HTX is experiencing mainstream exchanges cutting off access, with capital pathways shifting from open liquidity to addressing isolation and user fund blockages. Small transfers are interpreted as poisoning or testing.
Resource investment in internal investigations and public denials aims to clarify non-official actions and reduce further risk control spread, but the lack of complete results intensifies community skepticism.
Drawing parallels to early dust attacks and the chain reaction of freezes triggered by sanctions lists, the current crypto trading environment is transitioning from open transfers to strict source marking, with the industry as a whole shifting from free flow to prioritizing automatic compliance interception.
This essentially reflects the spillover of regulatory changes, where any associated transfers from sanctioned entities can trigger freezes. The mechanism is that exchanges' risk control directly maps small incoming transfers as high-risk sources, creating a chain reaction where users are passively affected.
ABAB News · Cognitive Law
Small incoming transfers can trigger freezes
Sanctions lists amplify address association risks
No results from investigations equal ongoing skepticism